I defended Trump? Where? Your canned talking points would work better if they actually pertained to the poster you are replying to. |
Link to where these several times happened then. |
There's actually no name calling in that post. Are you having hallucinations? |
I can't even imagine how long it would take me to search on "husband beats you" or something similar that would allow me to find those threads that contain those comments from October. But it's more time than I have. That was not the title of the thread. I know that it's difficult to accept that the people you call your own would make such a nasty comment, and I'm hopeful that it's because you'd never say such a thing yourself, but I'm sure you realize that liberals have been very angry as of late. If you've spent any time at all around here in this election season, it should hardly be outside the realm of possibility in anyone's mind. |
I guess you don't read the WSJ. Or is this feminist mother lying too? http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887324600704578405280211043510 |
Sure, some are nasty, but not nearly as horrible as the Trumpers. And since you didn't support your claim with any evidence, I will conclude it is baseless. Just like you concluded the abuse allegations by those three women are. Oh, except they actually had evidence. |
Ah, so since you found one case of a false accusation on the Internet, that means all three of these women must be lying. Trump logic. |
Time and again, when I try to give someone the benefit of the doubt here, I regret it. Eventually I'll learn that it's just never the right call. |
Yeah, I'm not giving you the benefit of the doubt any more than you did those abused women. |
I haven't said one word about the abused women. My first comment in this thread was to say that I've been accused of being an abused woman. |
You did that as a way of dismissing this issue with three trump administration people having a known history of domestic violence. is that not what you meant? You were just mentioning it for no reason? |
I didn't weigh in one way or the other because I hadn't heard this anywhere but on DCUM, so I'll reserve my condemnation until I have all the facts. But what human being would defend a wife beater? Of course I wouldn't. My point was only that, if true, nobody should be surprised because through this forum, it's come to my attention that (at least some) Democrats assume Republican men are wife beaters and their wives allow it. And you have dismissed that as false and called me a liar. So much for believing a woman's claims unless they're able to provide the proof you need to be able to do so. |
You didn't make any claims to anyone except an anonymous message board. Please. These women testified under oath and went to the police. Why don't you do some reading rather than try to deflect by changing the topic to how you were maligned on the Internet "several times". ? |
You're so right. Which is precisely why I'm now asking myself why I've wasted as much time as I have trying to convince you I'm not lying when the reality is I couldn't care less. |
|
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/vladimir-putin/11422969/Vladimir-Putin-is-a-wife-beater-and-six-other-claims-in-new-documentary.html
Oh look! Now I get why Trump and Putin get along so well! |