People, pay attention. There are two people discussed in Radar's article (skip Dlist's poorly written mash up):
Pedophile #1: A current Hollywood producer who molested Haim at age 11, ran a pedophile ring, and had the power to render people silent out of fear. Haim's abuse at the hands of this person was ongoing. This powerful pedophile is "one of the most recognizable faces in the industry," "has children of his own," and maintains a "family-man facade." He is also referred to as a "household name and revered by millions around the globe." Pedophile #2: At the end of the Radar article, there is an actor discussed who molested Haim LATER when Haim was in his mid-teens, separate and apart from Haim's abuse as a child: "The identity of the A-List individual at the center of Haim’s second nightmarish abuse occurred when he was in his mid-teens." TWO people. The A-list actor is NOT the family man referred to and is not the ringleader. Now, here is my contribution and why I am spinning this off from the other thread. Everyone in the other thread is focusing on the actor--pedophile #2--with a few also thinking of a current producer. But what if pedophile #1 was not a producer back then and is only just NOW a producer? As in he was a "superstar" A lister for a different reason back then and then became a producer? I ask because in another interview, Cory Feldman said this: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/corey-feldman-elijah-wood-hollywood-897403
Feldman also clarified that the ringleader is not Spielberg or Joel Schumacher or Michael Jackson. |
I am thinking of Clint Eastwood and Ron Howard. Once superstar actors who became superstar director/producers and have continued to be powerful and relevant. Both considered family men now. |
I always wondered if Roman Polanski came back to the US on private planes without the government knowing. He would have been in that kind of underworld, he raped that girl at Jack Nicholson's house. There is also Victor Salva. I'm not saying either one of those are part of this allegation, but goes to show how Hollywood has turned a blind-eye to this. |
No reason to have two threads on this. |
I disagree. The other thread is overrun with a focus on the actor and the assumption that the guy who ran things was a director back then. This one brings in a whole new twist and new info that was missed. |
Roman Polanski wouldn't shock anyone and no one knows who the hell Victor Salva is today. |
#1 Francis Ford Coppola or George Lucas |
#1 Francis Ford Coppola or George Lucas |
Sigh, these guys have always been major directors. Name someone who was famous for DIFFERENT reason. |
Bryan Singer
The other people strongly suspected to be in the ring are Martin Sheen and Charlie Sheen. |
Singer def runs a pedophilia ring and has been sued for it, so the surprise element that Radar emphasizes is missing. Plus, there is no way millions around the world love and admire him. He is also definitely not a household name globally. |
Bryan Singer - Doesn't seem like he was much of a Hollywood player in the 80 & 90's. |
It's pretty gross to speculate. I know it is usually fun to guess who a blind item is but in this case you know it is basically accusing someone of pedophilia and rape? Just wait for the into to be released. |
Singer is only 6 years older than Corey Feldman. Once again, you need to look for someone who is at least in his 60s. |
And now we have 2 threads with exactly the same theme. |