Newer bridges have "fenders" and are also designed so that if a section falls, the other sections will stay in tact. Outmoded bridge design likely contributed to catastrophic loss in Baltimore After a Florida bridge collapse tragedy, bridges were required to be built with protective “fenders” — but not until the 1990s. https://www.politico.com/news/2024/03/27/baltimore-bridge-design-fender-00149398 Why did Francis Scott Key bridge collapse so catastrophically? It didn't stand a chance. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2024/03/26/francis-scott-key-bridge-didnt-stand-chance/73103213007/ "modern bridges are typically designed so a small failure in one area doesn’t "propagate" to the entire bridge" |
In Philly, they just backfilled the overpass. It's temporary but it was quick. You can't do this here. For the bridge, you need to make an initial choice: just keep the existing approaches, or build new approaches for a wider bridge. The first is going to be faster. The second has more value over time. |
The President has guaranteed full federal responsibility for the cost of replacing the bridge, I saw that on TV. And while he also referenced expectation of Congressional support, there are already funds available to begin the project under the already passed infrastructure bill that includes a fund for bridge repair/replacement. https://www.transportation.gov/briefing-room/biden-harris-administration-opens-applications-over-9-billion-funding-modernize |
Thanks. I heard that too. Since I’m not entirely sure how all this actually works, I’ve been waiting to learn more details about the Congressional support piece. Or, perhaps you and/or others who are knowledgeable can tell me if Biden alone — or any President — actually can “guarantee full federal responsibility for the cost of a project” with a completion schedule that will likely extend beyond their term in office. I truly hope this is the case. |
Are you the same person on the other bridge post asking everyone to cite everything? That isn't necessary. |
Why would there be? Yes, C4 is toxic, but it wouldn't take that much. |
New bridge will probably be cable-stayed or suspension with 215 ft of clearance and a longer main span (i.e. towers/pylons w/fenders further from main shipping channel). New bridge will also likely be wider with 6 lanes. |
There is no telling how much asbestos and lead were used in the construction of that bridge. |
This was a good take by a shipping expert.
https://slate.com/business/2024/03/baltimore-bridge-collapse-francis-scott-key-maryland-deaths.html |
What would be the point of having more clearance than the Bay Bridge? |
Exactly. No matter how high they make it you can't get out to the ocean without getting under the bay bridge which is only 1 foot taller. |
According to this article, one of the 2 survivors crawled out the window of his sinking truck and somehow survived, despite having a significant chest injury and being a non-swimmer. Incredible.
https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/francis-scott-key-bridge-collapse-baltimore-construction-worker-interview/ |
Just want to thank you for the link and recommend others read it. It put a lot of stuff into perspective for me and dispels some junk commentary floating around about certain aspects of the incident. |
I wouldn’t call a ship that was 3 football fields long and weighed as much as a building colliding into a bridge support “a small failure”, and I doubt the quoted engineer would either. This is like saying that WTC wasn’t strong enough to withstand an impact from a Boeing 767. |
Oh well. Whatever the fastest way to clear the wreckage is the best way. |