Meeting between Lynchnand Clinton not a coincidence

[Anonymous]

http://observer.com/2016/07/exclusive-security-source-details-bill-clinton-maneuver-to-meet-loretta-lynch/

Former president delayed Phoenix takeoff to snare '20-25 minute encounter' with Attorney General

This stinks to high heaven.' With a looming FBI investigation Inthink he was trying to broker a deal.

The corrupt Hillary train is in motion

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:http://observer.com/2016/07/exclusive-security-source-details-bill-clinton-maneuver-to-meet-loretta-lynch/

Former president delayed Phoenix takeoff to snare '20-25 minute encounter' with Attorney General

This stinks to high heaven.' With a looming FBI investigation Inthink he was trying to broker a deal.

The corrupt Hillary train is in motion

And yet the Hillary supporters are STILL claiming she's innocent - and that this another right-wing conspiracy. Can you imagine if this were reversed....and it was the Republican under investigation - and his wife sat in a plane waiting for Lynch to arrive so they could have a secret meeting?

[Anonymous]

That's because they will vote for the Democratic candidate NO MATTER WHAT. About two years ago, I was at a hair salon, and the woman told me that if Hillary runs, she's voting for her. I asked her how she knows that, since we don't even know which Republicans will throw their hat in the ring. She said, "it doesn't matter. I will vote for ANY Democrat over ANY Republican."

Now watch. Someone will say the same about Republicans. Possibly, but not to that degree. In my dating years (20 years ago), I ran into several Democrats who said they would never date a Republican, sticking their superior noses up in the air. I never met a Republican who said he or she wouldn't date a Democrat. (Of course, that was 20 years ago. The country is so divided now - not helped by Obama referring to Republicans as "enemies" - it may go both ways at this point.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That's because they will vote for the Democratic candidate NO MATTER WHAT. About two years ago, I was at a hair salon, and the woman told me that if Hillary runs, she's voting for her. I asked her how she knows that, since we don't even know which Republicans will throw their hat in the ring. She said, "it doesn't matter. I will vote for ANY Democrat over ANY Republican."

Now watch. Someone will say the same about Republicans. Possibly, but not to that degree. In my dating years (20 years ago), I ran into several Democrats who said they would never date a Republican, sticking their superior noses up in the air. I never met a Republican who said he or she wouldn't date a Democrat. (Of course, that was 20 years ago. The country is so divided now - not helped by Obama referring to Republicans as "enemies" - it may go both ways at this point.)

Not only Obama. Hillary called them the enemy as well.

Former Obama advisor David Axelrod said on CNN’s New Day that Hillary Clinton made a mistake when she listed Republicans among her “enemies” during the first Democratic debate.

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/axelrod-hillary-made-poor-choice-calling-republicans-enemies-in-debate/

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

There is no "coincidence" in politics.

[Anonymous]

And now Hillary says she'll retain Lunch as well. Lots of back room deals going in here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And now Hillary says she'll retain Lunch as well. Lots of back room deals going in here.

I hope to retain Lunch, too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And now Hillary says she'll retain Lunch as well. Lots of back room deals going in here.

I hope to retain Lunch, too.

Me, too. I think the chicken I ate was spoiled.

But seriously....what do you mean "retain Lynch"? Is Lynch for hire?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And now Hillary says she'll retain Lunch as well. Lots of back room deals going in here.

I hope to retain Lunch, too.

Me, too. I think the chicken I ate was spoiled.

But seriously....what do you mean "retain Lynch"? Is Lynch for hire?

I think OP means keep her on board as AG

[Anonymous]

It's such a shame the best the Republicans have to counter Hillary is Donald Trump.

*Drops mic*

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And now Hillary says she'll retain Lunch as well. Lots of back room deals going in here.

I hope to retain Lunch, too.

Me, too. I think the chicken I ate was spoiled.

But seriously....what do you mean "retain Lynch"? Is Lynch for hire?

I think OP means keep her on board as AG

Thanks. I just looked it up and saw that's what she meant. Just think of the conflict-of-interest that Lynch has. If she goes ahead with an indictment (pending FBI recommendation), she is essentially handing the win to the Republicans and costing herself her own job. She really needs to recuse herself. That excuse about not "being briefed" if she steps down shows how stupid the Democrats are hoping we are. Why would she need to be briefed on a case in which she has no role?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And now Hillary says she'll retain Lunch as well. Lots of back room deals going in here.

I hope to retain Lunch, too.

Well if Hillary is elected, a majority of Americans won't

[Anonymous]

This is a non-issue for anyone intelligent and mature.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's such a shame the best the Republicans have to counter Hillary is Donald Trump.

*Drops mic*

I agree. Shows stupidity runs on both sides. Virtually any other Republican candidate (well....maybe not Ben Carson, who seems nice enough but completely unqualified) would have been better than the Hillary v Trump we're stuck with now.