We were instructed to give more easy goals and documented achievements to dei employees. This is a big tech company. |
+1 |
DEI in large corporations can be misguided and suck AND systemic and structural racism can be real. Individuals definitely get negatively caught up in crappy DEI-led decisions just like individuals get negatively caught up in the downstream impacts of structural and systemic racism. And it feels not fair to all those people.
All the things can be true. |
Because you care SO much, I’m curious to know how you and you DEI believers have altered your own lives and habits, so you’re not exploiting people of modern day. Tell me about your diamonds, your meat processed by child labor, the organic fruit and vegetables picked by undocumented workers. I’m sure all of you are walking poster boards for conscious living. SMH Point it, you all are full of it. Boring and board. |
Boring and bored. Not board. You're not even responding to any of the content. It's just more babble talking points. It's kind of sad. |
Should have documented it and sued them |
Ma’am, I think you’re revealing your own set of issues. Point is, DEI makes white people feel like they have to expose hardship to justify feeling bad about experiencing racism-something that is wrong regardless of justification. Current brainwashed society teaches that a person must experience something bad to deserve empathy/hiring points. It’s abusive. |
Again, you’ve failed to self reflect. DEI is great about calling out distant history and pointing fingers, but it’s all performative. Behind HR and radicalizing students, followers aren’t changing behaviors that contribute to modern day oppression. That’s how you know it’s junk. And you should be sad, especially if you’re short on oppression points. |
It's a funny claim and historically wrong because for much of American history blacks were predominately concentrated in the South and in agriculture. They didn't build the railroads, work in the coal mines, staff the factories of the north until well into the 20th century, clear the vast forests of the midwest, break the sod on the prairies, etc cetera. Black labor definitely played a role in helping create American prosperity but blacks did not "build" the country. If anything, how could they build the country when they effectively weren't allowed to be anything more than the most basic field hand and housemaid for much of American history? Ultimately, America really was built by white people for white people, which ironically is also what a lot of CRT people like to say too without realizing the full extent of their message when they focus about the hostility towards black people (which is also true, white Americans have historically not wanted black people around and resented their presence). As it is, life is definitely way more complicated than DEI proponents like you want to believe in your delusional woe is me mindset. I'm a historical realist. Not a cherry picker of facts to explain away your personal failures. But I'll tell you who the real privileged people are these days. The young urban black men who get to run red lights while the police do nothing. |
+1 OP here. I completely agree. Is me as a White person being offended by a DEI training, or being passed over for a job because another candidate was similarly qualified and Black, the worst thing in the world? Of course not. The problems DEI is trying to address that mainly impact BIPOC people are much worse than that But significant amounts of money and time, including taxpayer dollars, are being devoted to these initiatives, and it's all being made up on the fly and often alienating the people that need to buy into it while often putting BIPOC people in positions that become untenable because they are viewed as diversity hires and part of the DEI "stuff" that everyone already rolls their eyes at. |
My company hired a POC in a DEI initiative and she did not get along with her supervisor (the one who hired her). She eventually quit and accused two seniors of racism, which effectively ended the DEI initiative for any qualified potential hire ever again. It was such an ordeal because of the racism accusation (for which there was no evidence afterwards) that the senior leadership felt it was too much of a headache and stopped hiring POC in that role. |
I'm Latina and I'm pretty irritated that I haven't benefited from any of this stuff. And, now it's going to go away and my kids won't be able to benefit either. I know we're not the target audience but they at least pay lip service to latinos.
But, of course we don't need it. And, I would hate the feeling of being the minority hire and wondering if I was actually "less than." So, pros and cons. |
I was on a call with a large Federal agency last year about increasing diversity in the workplace and was so disgusted. They said that as long as someone meets the minimum qualifications for a position, then hiring managers should be picking the "diverse" candidate. No consideration for the "non-diverse" who have strong qualifications above the minimum such as an advanced degree, extensive experience etc. The message couldn't have been more clear. |
Raise your non diverse kids to become business owners. |
It’s alarmingly hard for white guys to get hired for openings right now. Many people will say not hiring white men is progress. |