Definitely this. I understand that club volleyball (and other travel sports) can be really expensive, but I hope that most parents don't think of their kids' activities in terms of return on investment, but instead whether they enjoy it and whether it provides life experiences that helps them develop as a person. Even if they don't intend to play volleyball in college, having played a team sport like club volleyball is a good activity to include on a college applications. |
This is a good short discussion of the numbers of D1 volleyball players and scholarships: https://www.instagram.com/p/C4WeC6JMYOm/ Yes, volleyball scholarships are extremely difficult to get, but many of the players you see committed from Metro and Paramount are getting athletic scholarships. One caveat is that it is even more difficult for liberos/defensive specialists to get athletic scholarships. It's simple supply and demand. Since height is not required to be a high level defensive player there are many, many more for D1 programs to choose from and they generally do not need to use any of their scholarships to get a quality libero. |
This is an additional reason for the volleyball clubs to stop pretending that they are all competitive and charge a ton of money for their "travel" teams. Most parents would be happy with a regional option that costs less and minimizes overnight lodging for out-of-state tournaments. |
Coaches, are you happy with how much you make as you coach your team(s)? Do you feel like the club owners value your experience? Is your pay reasonable when you take into account the club profits? Do you agree with the parents who claim that clubs take advantage of the demand and overcharge them? |
Paramount 18s entirely D1? I don’t think so at all. Metro’s really the only one that is all D1 (with rare exceptions). Paramount is usually a 70/30 split between D1 and D3 (with some great D3 schools). Scholarships are underwhelming overall, except for the best in either team. |
Even for a top club like Metro - only approximately half of the players are actually getting a full ride scholarship. Many of the other players are either walk-ons or getting a 1-year scholarship. That is most likely also true for Paramount as well. So for other less competitive clubs, full ride scholarship is very rare. Many club "sell" the new parents that all of their players play DI schools. What they don't mention is that most are not on a full-scholarship and are still paying to attend college. So parents need to be realistic about their DD's motivation/work ethic and natural athletic talents when deciding on the club. It is unlikely that a player on the bench will get a full-ride scholarship. |
I think for Metro, it depends on the particular year as to how many of their D1 commits have 4-year, full rides, but you’re definitely correct that it’s not all. Even amongst those with athletic scholarships, different schools pay for different stuff. Some programs pay all tuition, room/board, books, and maybe even a stipend. Others maybe it’s only tuition or tuition and room/board or even less. Athletes at service academies get the same deal as everyone else so it’s technically not a scholarship but being a recruited athlete can make getting admitted easier. While still D1, Ivy League schools do not give any athletic scholarships at all. All of this is further confirmation that looking at the cost of club volleyball as an investment that will yield returns in the form of an athletic scholarship is not realistic for most people. But I’d guess that many (if not most) of the players that want to play in college are motivated to do so because they love the game, regardless of whether there is any financial benefit or not. |
$4,000 per player and they own the practice facility!! Where is that $$$ going?? |
The facility might be theirs on paper, but they are probably still paying for it. The same as most of our houses: we theoretically own them, but we are paying mortgage. |