Are we moving towards communism?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So basically this entire thread seems to be nothing but trolling. Or attempts at trolling.

Are you 12:34?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We'd be a lot better off if we *were* a socialist system (communism has too many negative connotations to stupid people who don't understand it, therefore it's a term that should be quietly retired).

We wouldn't have the mess we have now. Or a disgustingly unfair distribution of wealth. Or poverty. Or 59,000,000 people without medical insurance or able to get medical care. Or people destroying the planet in the pursuit of unnecessary excesses. And we could get rid of this absurd political and electoral circus we engage in that is just a giant money-hole. Replace it with a consistent, stable one party system where leadership is determined on the basis of who is most qualified rather than who raises the most money or buys the most votes. We'd all be better off if we had a socialist system.

Only people who benefit in a socialist system are the top. The idiots that advocate for it are usually rich whites people who have no clue and are weak and simple minded. The other are groups of people who love Che despite the fact he was a racist homophobe

You are confused. Take a look at Northern Europe. That is what the young people are thinking when they long for a social democratic government.

Not me. I want Soviet-style. Where dissenters and trouble makers were sent eastward and never troubled anyone again. Imagine what a country we could have if we could send all the trumptards to our own equivalent of Siberia, and we would finally be free of them

Shut the fuc up, you asinine fool. My uncle was murdered in Siberia.

My above comment was in response to the 12:34 freggin liberal bigot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We'd be a lot better off if we *were* a socialist system (communism has too many negative connotations to stupid people who don't understand it, therefore it's a term that should be quietly retired).

We wouldn't have the mess we have now. Or a disgustingly unfair distribution of wealth. Or poverty. Or 59,000,000 people without medical insurance or able to get medical care. Or people destroying the planet in the pursuit of unnecessary excesses. And we could get rid of this absurd political and electoral circus we engage in that is just a giant money-hole. Replace it with a consistent, stable one party system where leadership is determined on the basis of who is most qualified rather than who raises the most money or buys the most votes. We'd all be better off if we had a socialist system.

Only people who benefit in a socialist system are the top. The idiots that advocate for it are usually rich whites people who have no clue and are weak and simple minded. The other are groups of people who love Che despite the fact he was a racist homophobe

You are confused. Take a look at Northern Europe. That is what the young people are thinking when they long for a social democratic government.

Not me. I want Soviet-style. Where dissenters and trouble makers were sent eastward and never troubled anyone again. Imagine what a country we could have if we could send all the trumptards to our own equivalent of Siberia, and we would finally be free of them

Shut the fuc up, you asinine fool. My uncle was murdered in Siberia.

Was he a malcontent or trouble maker? Perhaps he was.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hillary is the most corrupted politician this country has ever had. She needs to go away or go to prison.

Oh, my god, Hillary, Obama, Benghazi, .... take some responsibility, you dope head. Republicans are running the country right now, including a stolen seat on the supreme court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So basically this entire thread seems to be nothing but trolling. Or attempts at trolling.

A lot of these threads, just like the Russian faked BLM posts, are intended to stir uphatred between democrats and republicans, and undermine America.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We live in an oligarchy, where monied interests like Comcast and Wall Street call the shots, coupled with an inept narcissist at the helm, and a congress too fearful of being unseated politically to actively challenge his transgressions. Redustricting has played a large role in a minority of the country wielding outside influence on our electoral system. Now we have climate change denial, abortion language tucked into a tax reform bill, net neutrality on the line among other problems. These are very scary times. It doesn't help that populist sentiment is spreading or that anti-intellectualism is de tiger.

Don't like Comcast? Stop watching NBC, MSNBC, and Telemundo.

All freggin Libs, you know. Screw 'em!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We live in an oligarchy, where monied interests like Comcast and Wall Street call the shots, coupled with an inept narcissist at the helm, and a congress too fearful of being unseated politically to actively challenge his transgressions. Redustricting has played a large role in a minority of the country wielding outside influence on our electoral system. Now we have climate change denial, abortion language tucked into a tax reform bill, net neutrality on the line among other problems. These are very scary times. It doesn't help that populist sentiment is spreading or that anti-intellectualism is de tiger.

Don't like Comcast? Stop watching NBC, MSNBC, and Telemundo.

All freggin Libs, you know. Screw 'em!

What a lazy troll. At least try to earn your keep.

[Anonymous]

if we move to a post scarcity society then sure, that would likely be communist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What’s the matter OP? You a Russian troll trying to degrade patriotism and make us hate our flag?


Or are you just Eurotrash that would be here if America hadn’t stepped into Germany 65-70 years ago?

Need to learn some history. The Soviet Union played the biggest role in stopping Hitler's armies to the tune of 22 million dead Soviets