And that orangehead would have defeated Clinton in '20. But then there would then be no Biden president. Or would Biden have tried to run against that orangehead for a first time '24? We won't know now will we? |
Way too much power in the hands of a few. |
Biden needs to drop Kamala and add Hillary as his VP candidate. |
The only swap needed is Biden backing out of the race so that a viable candidate can crush Trump in the manner that a POTUS candidate as awful as Trump should be crushed. The 2024 election should be a landslide victory for any major party candidate opposing Trump. |
Hillary isn’t a man. |
No it’s bush’s fault. |
Right. The Democrats looked at all possible people to challenge Trump, & the best they could come up with was an incompetent senile imbecile who wasn’t coherent even 40 years ago. Either careers were stifled or even the best Democrat is an idiot. |
There are multi term Democratic state governors that would be solid presidential candidates. Governors that would have a similar chance of successful presidential runs as Clinton had when he ran in 1992. They just aren't as aligned with the mega donor entities as a 50 year politician like Biden is and they aren't willing to fight the uphold battle it would be to run against the establishment. What the people want and need isn't what the wealthy and powerful political donors want. All this being said; at least the Dem party hasn't fallen to the level of nominating a Trump three consecutive elections. |
Democrats have no viable candidate. They’re 100% focused on taking down their orange boogie man. |
Biden is better than Trump, so that makes him viable. I'd agree if GOP had a good candidate. They just don't. |
Biden can’t even communicate coherently. |