Right, breaking even with normal appreciation given transaction costs is what makes it a "worthwhile choice" - actually a more than worthwhile choice because of the money you would have saved renting. So... thanks for proving my point? |
Between 1900 and 2000 real estate appreciated at about the rate of inflation, maybe add < 1%. Not true for 2000-2022. But I expect after some time goes by, we will look back and say "Hey, from 1900 to 2050, real estate appreciated by about the rate of inflation, maybe add < 1%"" |
“Chicken Little” boomer is back! You’re wrong, inventory is up by 34% YoY. New listing have decreased but not nearly as much as demand has. https://www.realtor.com/research/tag/housing-inventory/ There are always people have to sell, and never people who have to buy. Just takes a handful of low comps to get the ball rolling. I bought my house before the pandemic. If prices drop 20% I will still be in great shape. Still great appreciation so I won’t be under water, plus the move up house I’ll want to buy will also be priced lower. I’m selling my house once house prices decline, not when interest rates decline. You have it exactly backwards. I don’t care about some theoretical price I could have gotten in February 2022. |
If you decide to sell. If you don’t sell—if you just stay in your house—it doesn’t matter if prices collapse or go up to the stratosphere. It has no impact on your life from a financial standpoint. It might affect what kind of neighbors you get, but that’s a different story. |
Right, in an environment of normal appreciation, buying and holding for 5 years will likely put you at break even. But we’re talking about a scenario of prices dropping. You will not break even, you will be down. No one ever said anything about renting. We are move up buyers. But since you mentioned renting, most people rent a much cheaper place than they would want to buy. When we were renting, our rent was much less than the property taxes and maintenance expenses of our current house. Plus we put the money we were saving by living in a cheaper place into an index fund which beat home value appreciation. And we had the freedom to move wherever we wanted, whenever we wanted. We really came out ahead. |
There sure are financial effects. What if you want to move for a higher paying job? What if you want to refinance and are under water? Want if you want to take out a HELOC? And if you had decided not to fight the Fed and waited to buy, you’d be in much better financial shape. I get that you can’t tell the future, but Powell is literally telling you what they are going to do to the market. |
Yes, and this is what he said: “So there was a big imbalance between supply and demand. Housing prices were going up at an unsustainably fast level. So the deceleration in housing prices that we’re seeing should help bring sort of prices more closely in line with rents and other housing market fundamentals, and that’s a good thing. For the longer term, what we need is supply and demand to get better aligned so that housing prices go up at a reasonable level—at a reasonable pace—and that people can afford houses again. And I think we—so we probably, in the housing market, have to go through a correction to get back to that place.” He is talking about a correction between the supply and demand. Another PP is correct, a sharp decline in housing prices will just fuel demand, recreating the imbalance. He also said there are outside pressures on the market that impact supply and those are longer term issues (supply chain, lack of affordable housing). In his second response he noted that shelter inflation may remain high for quite some time. |
Our mortgage and maintenance is much much cheaper than anything comparable to what i could rent. I don’t know what your angle is, but buying in DC is pretty much as safe a bet as you can get (when of course there are no safe bets by definition). I also have the freedom to move whenever i want ( could rent my place for 3x my expenses), but while also maintaining my investment… so who is “ahead”? |
Owning a home that does not rise in value at all if a primary home is meaningless.
Homes used to be your bought a home, took a 30 year mortgage. After 30 years had a mortgage burning party. You then retire in your home mortgage free no worries. My 81 year old mother in law bought her first house 24. Her husband was 26 and they had a 2 and 4 year old. They bought a 1,300 sf house and had two “boarders” upstairs first 3-5 years and part of downpayment aunt loaned at full market rate. My father in Law worked a second job at 20 hours a week to pay back that loan with interest and got rid of boarders at year. She is a widow and owns home 57 years. At 1,300 sf on a 40x100 plot perfect size to manage. People even if we have 10 percent mortgages could do what she and husband did. Buy less of a home, get tenants, get a second job. She is going out feet first. |
Like these sellers HAVE to move apparently and risk taking a loss on the sale.
https://www.redfin.com/DC/Washington/3122-Newton-St-NE-20018/home/10105498#property-history |
+1 this time we actually know what the Fed is trying to do. |
Slightly OT but I just don’t understand why flippers give so much attention to things like tile and backsplash and then throw up those godawful Home Depot grade hollow core doors. |
No. But clearly math is not your strong suit. |
And history isn’t yours. |
good. hopefully we will start building more too. things like the 'missing middle' movement and navy yard development are starting to make a difference |