
I'm PP and I agree with this, but I maintain that it sounds like the son is saying things that are true and substantive. |
You don’t know what “intolerance” and “bigotry” mean, fool. You are correct that I won’t tolerate his health care, tax and net neutrality policies, not to mention his foreign policy. But that isn’t “intolerance” or “bigotry.” It is a reaction to the things he says and does, not hatred based on creed, color or national origin. Quit coopting the language or the oppressed by applying it to political disagreement. You are not being persecuted. We don’t hate you or Trump because of who you are, we hate you because of what you say and do. Understand the difference. |
You could credibly insist more people respect the office with Trump in it if he led by example. But his behavior demeans it daily. |
OP is about behavior. It's irrelevant if the statements are true or false. It's about delivery. OP didn't provide an example of substantive sayings. |
I suspect OP cares very little about the substance of her son's views as long as they fall into line with OP's. Kind of like Trump. |
I have no respect for this idiot president either. Let your son have his own political opinions and beliefs - respect is earned. And that fool in the White House has not earned it. |
I am 62 and I agree 100%. Plus, OP, your son is exercising his free speech. |
I give OP benefit of the doubt. I think OP is approaching it's wrong by talking about essentially hurt feelings: "DS needs to understand that for some people, Donald Trump is representing their interests, and in fact, that is a majority of our population." This is no way to win an argument. Lots of unpopular opinions became popular opinions over time. Instead of focusing on offending people, OP can start a conversation about government, laws, voting, supreme court, etc. Lots of adults, not just teenagers, don't realize how unique and amazing our system is, where you don't give all the power to one person in charge and where you personality create and vote on your local laws. Some people can't take emotion out of it, so OP can teach the kid how, when and why to step back and change the topic. Not all fights are worth fighting for, especially at a dinner table, supposedly food does not taste as good if you are angry. |
If everyone was exercising their free speech at family gatherings it would make for lots of very unpleasant evenings. Not the holidays people want to have. |
At the dinner table? Don't you know the old etiquette rule of the three things never to discuss at the dinner table or polite company: politics, money and religion. Raise your children not to discuss any of these. It's all the more true now on campus. My kids are conservatives and we have suggested that they never talk about politics anywhere on campus, because next thing you know you will be hauled up before a campus committee or later in life reported to HR (another ongoing thread). Parents should be teaching their children moderation and decorum in publc. |
Yes, all we need are more entitled snowflakes throwing tantrums about democratically elected politicians and calling those who voted for him, "idiots." Oh, and also protesting (often violently) whenever their school invites a speaker with whom they disagree. "Freedom of speech!! As long as I agree with it." ![]() |
DP. I think you know what these words mean all too well. |
If you were at my dinner table and said that about the president, I'd escort you out. What a stupid thing to say. |
Hey, it's a valid question he asked of your sister. Respect is earned. Trump should work on earning some |
Or kind of like the liberals over on another thread who were saying how ashamed and disappointed they'd be if their kids grew up to be conservatives. And that they would cease to "like" them anymore. Lovely examples of great parenting. http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/15/684174.page |