Russian Plot to Elect Trump Included Jill Stein

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
We have no proof of anything as yet, but...
I never liked Jill Stein.
She gave off such a bad vibe.

Serious question: which Presidential candidate gave off of a good vibe? The list of candidates seemed to some of us a bestiary of elite pathologies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From this article: http://www.salon.com/2016/12/02/jill-stein-spoiled-the-2016-election-for-hillary-clinton/

Jill Stein is now officially the Ralph Nader of 2016.

Stein votes/Trump margin:
MI: 51,463/10,704
PA: 49,678/46,765
WI: 31,006/22,177

Don't forget that nearly 90,000 people in Michigan cast ballots without selecting a presidential candidate. Stein, like Russia, is hyped because incompetent and shameless Democrats refuse to take responsibility for a horrible politics and candidates.

http://www.mlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/11/michigans_presidential_electio.html

Or that could be 90,000 Republicans who abstained rather than vote for the Treason Party. But I'd guess you swim in the filth of right wing crazy.

Yeah, that's a well-reasoned response. And the "right wing crazy" is way off.

Lots of sorry Clintonites on this board.

Oh, crazy bitter Bernie or buster is back.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From this article: http://www.salon.com/2016/12/02/jill-stein-spoiled-the-2016-election-for-hillary-clinton/

Jill Stein is now officially the Ralph Nader of 2016.

Stein votes/Trump margin:
MI: 51,463/10,704
PA: 49,678/46,765
WI: 31,006/22,177

Don't forget that nearly 90,000 people in Michigan cast ballots without selecting a presidential candidate. Stein, like Russia, is hyped because incompetent and shameless Democrats refuse to take responsibility for a horrible politics and candidates.

http://www.mlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/11/michigans_presidential_electio.html

Or that could be 90,000 Republicans who abstained rather than vote for the Treason Party. But I'd guess you swim in the filth of right wing crazy.

Yeah, that's a well-reasoned response. And the "right wing crazy" is way off.

Lots of sorry Clintonites on this board.

Oh, crazy bitter Bernie or buster is back.

So glad you remember me. Remember that to win elections you need to impress people beyond your tight little cliques. Ta-ta!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
We have no proof of anything as yet, but...
I never liked Jill Stein.
She gave off such a bad vibe.

Serious question: which Presidential candidate gave off of a good vibe? The list of candidates seemed to some of us a bestiary of elite pathologies.

You're right!!!
Well, I did have a soft spot for Hillary, despite her faults.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From this article: http://www.salon.com/2016/12/02/jill-stein-spoiled-the-2016-election-for-hillary-clinton/

Jill Stein is now officially the Ralph Nader of 2016.

Stein votes/Trump margin:
MI: 51,463/10,704
PA: 49,678/46,765
WI: 31,006/22,177

Don't forget that nearly 90,000 people in Michigan cast ballots without selecting a presidential candidate. Stein, like Russia, is hyped because incompetent and shameless Democrats refuse to take responsibility for a horrible politics and candidates.

http://www.mlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/11/michigans_presidential_electio.html

Or that could be 90,000 Republicans who abstained rather than vote for the Treason Party. But I'd guess you swim in the filth of right wing crazy.

Yeah, that's a well-reasoned response. And the "right wing crazy" is way off.

Lots of sorry Clintonites on this board.

Oh, crazy bitter Bernie or buster is back.

So glad you remember me. Remember that to win elections you need to impress people beyond your tight little cliques. Ta-ta!

Hey, how's Mrs. Sanders' investigation coming along?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From this article: http://www.salon.com/2016/12/02/jill-stein-spoiled-the-2016-election-for-hillary-clinton/

Jill Stein is now officially the Ralph Nader of 2016.

Stein votes/Trump margin:
MI: 51,463/10,704
PA: 49,678/46,765
WI: 31,006/22,177

Don't forget that nearly 90,000 people in Michigan cast ballots without selecting a presidential candidate. Stein, like Russia, is hyped because incompetent and shameless Democrats refuse to take responsibility for a horrible politics and candidates.

http://www.mlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/11/michigans_presidential_electio.html

Or that could be 90,000 Republicans who abstained rather than vote for the Treason Party. But I'd guess you swim in the filth of right wing crazy.

Yeah, that's a well-reasoned response. And the "right wing crazy" is way off.

Lots of sorry Clintonites on this board.

Oh, crazy bitter Bernie or buster is back.

So glad you remember me. Remember that to win elections you need to impress people beyond your tight little cliques. Ta-ta!

Hey, how's Mrs. Sanders' investigation coming along?

I'm afraid it isn't half as entertaining as Clintonites desperately trying to construct exculpatory narratives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:From this article: http://www.salon.com/2016/12/02/jill-stein-spoiled-the-2016-election-for-hillary-clinton/

Jill Stein is now officially the Ralph Nader of 2016.

Stein votes/Trump margin:
MI: 51,463/10,704
PA: 49,678/46,765
WI: 31,006/22,177

Gary Johnson got more votes in all three of those states than Jill Stein did. This can only mean one thing: GARY JOHNSON IS ALSO PART OF THE RUSSIAN PLOT! OH NO!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From this article: http://www.salon.com/2016/12/02/jill-stein-spoiled-the-2016-election-for-hillary-clinton/

Jill Stein is now officially the Ralph Nader of 2016.

Stein votes/Trump margin:
MI: 51,463/10,704
PA: 49,678/46,765
WI: 31,006/22,177

Gary Johnson got more votes in all three of those states than Jill Stein did. This can only mean one thing: GARY JOHNSON IS ALSO PART OF THE RUSSIAN PLOT! OH NO!

Did he also have dinner with Mike Flynn in Moscow?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From this article: http://www.salon.com/2016/12/02/jill-stein-spoiled-the-2016-election-for-hillary-clinton/

Jill Stein is now officially the Ralph Nader of 2016.

Stein votes/Trump margin:
MI: 51,463/10,704
PA: 49,678/46,765
WI: 31,006/22,177

Gary Johnson got more votes in all three of those states than Jill Stein did. This can only mean one thing: GARY JOHNSON IS ALSO PART OF THE RUSSIAN PLOT! OH NO!

Did he also have dinner with Mike Flynn in Moscow?

No idea. But he did say "US intervention in Ukraine is like Russian intervention in Puerto Rico". HE'S CLEARLY WORKING FOR PUTIN! RUSSIANS ARE RUINING EVERYTHING GOOD IN AMERICA! COLD WAR 2.0 NEEDS TO BEGIN NOW!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

So glad you remember me. Remember that to win elections you need to impress people beyond your tight little cliques. Ta-ta!

Something that Bernie Sanders notably failed to do.

[Anonymous]

Remember that picture of Jill Stein, Michael Flynn and Vladimir Putin all sitting around a table having dinner?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

So glad you remember me. Remember that to win elections you need to impress people beyond your tight little cliques. Ta-ta!

Something that Bernie Sanders notably failed to do.

LOL! Bernie has the highest approval ratings of any current American poltician.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From this article: http://www.salon.com/2016/12/02/jill-stein-spoiled-the-2016-election-for-hillary-clinton/

Jill Stein is now officially the Ralph Nader of 2016.

Stein votes/Trump margin:
MI: 51,463/10,704
PA: 49,678/46,765
WI: 31,006/22,177

Don't forget that nearly 90,000 people in Michigan cast ballots without selecting a presidential candidate. Stein, like Russia, is hyped because incompetent and shameless Democrats refuse to take responsibility for a horrible politics and candidates.

http://www.mlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/11/michigans_presidential_electio.html

Or that could be 90,000 Republicans who abstained rather than vote for the Treason Party. But I'd guess you swim in the filth of right wing crazy.

Yeah, that's a well-reasoned response. And the "right wing crazy" is way off.

Lots of sorry Clintonites on this board.

Oh, crazy bitter Bernie or buster is back.

So glad you remember me. Remember that to win elections you need to impress people beyond your tight little cliques. Ta-ta!

Hey, how's Mrs. Sanders' investigation coming along?

I'm afraid it isn't half as entertaining as Clintonites desperately trying to construct exculpatory narratives.

Look at you with your five dollar words! Nah, the Sanders's tangled finances are of great interest.