Palin Married in Aug 1988, Gave Birth 8 Months Later

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

I am LMAO. Do you really intend to suggest that this media circus could somehow be any bigger, more intrusive, and more negative if it were one of Obama's daughters (assuming one of them were 17)? Come on!


I am betting that a black candidate would not get near as much leeway and "understanding" if his teenaged daughter turned up pregnant. All this celebration of life stuff, how wonderful it is that she's "choosing" to keep the baby just wouldn't fly. The family would be ripped to shreds amidst moaning about the dismal state of youth today... and their permissive parents.


I agree with this response. The same people holding up Bristol's teen pregnancy as virtuous would, indeed, question the Obamas' parenting skills were one of their girls preggers, in addition to pointing to the stereotype of unwed black teens. Tsk. Tsk.


Yeah, the Palins are getting a whole log of understanding and sympathy from the media, the public, and, of course, DCUM posters. McCain's staff aren't being bombarded by questions from journalists wondering when Palin will withdraw. Right? Wrong. Your perception is incredibly skewed if you think that's true. You must not be following the media circus at all.

I have been very impressed by Barack Obama telling people to back off, and by black columnists like Courtland Milloy and Colby King saying the same thing. But the media in general, and the public (or at least the skewy public as represented by DCUM), are not at all sympathetic.


I'm referring to the Republican Delegates and others who are at the convention. They wholeheartedly support a teen mom and how wonderful it is to keep the baby. The same hypocrites would turn the other cheek in disgust if it were one of Barack's daughters. You can count on that.


The evangelicals I know, and I know many, would not turn away in disgust if one of Obama's daughters were pregnant and kept the baby. I'm not sure how many Christians you know well, but I suspect it's not many.

The Republican delegates at the convention don't shape the media coverage of Bristol's pregnancy. The media have not been sympathetic and that coverage is what will determine how most Americans view this. In fact, the media are not only unsympathetic, they're vultures.


Just as long as you remember that it's not THE MEDIA you are voting for in November. Republicans love to equate THE MEDIA and the Democrats as if they are the same f*cking thing. I also read Palin will be discussing the "Washington elite" tonight--I'm guessing there are no elite Republicans--and dissing community organizers. She is all class; she fits right in.

Also, you can bet your sweet ass these Republican blowhards and their surrogates of evil--ie Rove, Limbaugh, etc--would never, ever, ever stop spewing if the situation were reversed, and it were Biden's or Obama's daughter. If you think otherwise, you are living in a fantasy world.
Anonymous
I just read that Palin vetoed a measure that would have provided help to Alaskan teens who were pregnant out of wedlock.

Yet she's completely against abortion for any reason.

Michelle Obama is absolutely right: This country -- or at least the GOP -- is just plain mean.

I don't see this statement as a sign that Michelle Obama is an "angry" woman. She's honest.

When I think of McCain/Palin getting elected, I cry for my children.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:not to hijac -- but i loved campbell brown's interview! it was on CNN.com the other day -- absolutely painful to watch the campaign spokesman not to be able to come up with anything to say that actually answered her question!!!


Agreed. She was just asking a follow up question about something the McCain flak put into play himself.

Am I the only one who sees the irony in John "media darling" McCain now playing the victim because the press has the nerve to examine his choice of VP? Hilarious.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oh, didn't you get the memo? The abstinence decree only applies to poor, inner-city girls. Good God-fearing, red-blooded, gun-toting white girls have the good judgement to "do the right thing" when Mother Nature asserts herself.


I agree that there is a double standard. Imagine the scandal if one of Obama's daughters was older and preggers ...


I am LMAO. Do you really intend to suggest that this media circus could somehow be any bigger, more intrusive, and more negative if it were one of Obama's daughters (assuming one of them were 17)? Come on!


I wouldn't even want to imagine it. It wouldn't have been the mainstream media you would have to worry about it would be the water cooler talk, the person you thought you knew, the shock/jock type right wing outlets, and the people that post comments about news stories that link everything to race (I'm frankly surprised there aren't already comments somehow trying to blame this on the poor inner city girls).

On my way home I was thinking - who knew the Republican convention would provide baby mama drama. I surely didn't see this one coming.
Anonymous
I just read that Palin vetoed a measure that would have provided help to Alaskan teens who were pregnant out of wedlock.


This is just another example of the media and the far-left purposefully mis-representing who Palin is and what she has done:

Contrary to a report from the Washington Post, Alaska Governor, Sarah Palin, did not slash funding for a program for teen mothers.

The Washington Post’s Paul Kane reported late yesterday that “Palin Slashed Funding for Teen Moms.” To support this contention Kane pointed out that “Palin reduced funding for Covenant House Alaska by more than 20 percent, cutting funds from $5 million to $3.9 million.”

Covenant House Alaska is a faith-based, not-for-profit agency which provides a variety of services to troubled teens, including a home for teen moms. Although the work with adolescent mothers is only one component of their work, Kane focused on this aspect of their work due to the revelation that Governor Palin’s teen daughter is 5 months pregnant.

In Alaska, the governor is allowed to reduce spending allocations in the service of sound management and fiscal accountability. To prove his contention that Palin slashed funds for teen mothers, Kane produced the Alaska 2008 budget with Sarah Palin’s line by line adjustments. It is true that lawmakers allocated 5 million to Covenant House Alaska and that Mrs. Palin cut that allocation to 3.9 million dollars. However, what is misleading about the Post headline is that the allocation of 3.9 million is three times more than Covenant House Alaska received from government grants in 2007. According to records on the Covenant House Alaska website, the organization received just over 1.3 million dollars from grants in 2007 and nearly 1.2 million in 2006. Even with the reductions, Governor Palin signed a budget which provided three times more funds than the organization received in 2007.

Thus, the Post report is misleading on two counts. One, the funding in question went to an organization which engaged in many different services, including work with teen mothers. There was no funding exclusively earmarked for pregnant teens.

Two, the report leaves the impression that the Governor reduced existing funding levels, when in fact, the Palin-approved budget allowed a massive expansion of funding for this worthy faith-based organization. The organization’s total revenue for 2007 was just over 3 million dollars and so the 3.9 million approved by Palin and the Alaska legislature was a huge increase.

Viewed within the context of prior expenditures, it becomes clear that Governor Palin increased funding for social services which benefit kids, not “slashed” them as the Post reported. However, it also appears clear that she is not afraid to exercise some measure of fiscal discipline, even when the reduction targets those of similar ideology.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Big deal. Barack Obama would be the first to tell you that. He mentions his mother's pre-marital pregnancy when telling reporters to back off Palin. Another one of the mean-spirited pot-stirring posts and we know where it's coming from.


its a big deal because she says one thing but does another.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Big deal. Barack Obama would be the first to tell you that. He mentions his mother's pre-marital pregnancy when telling reporters to back off Palin. Another one of the mean-spirited pot-stirring posts and we know where it's coming from.


its a big deal because she says one thing but does another.


Um, hello. . . . She was 24 years old, got married, and had a baby 8 months later. Big whoop. I sincerely doubt she was preaching abstinence when she was 24. Do you really want to go there? Barack Obama strongly opposes the use of illegal drugs. Oops, Barack Obama used illegal drugs fairly heavily in his late teens and early 20s. He says one thing but does another! Like I said, do you really want to go there? No.

Sincerely,
A disgusted Obama supporter who wishes you would keep your eyes on the prize
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: