Do Students Run the Show at Sidwell Upper School?

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
Not just at a "school function" but inside the Meeting House; a clear act of dissrespect. Can you imagine a St Alban's boy conceiving of something like this inside the National Cathedral ?? Have the parents of these young adults made a formal apology to the Meeting ?

STA boys are too busy giving each other blowjobs.

[/quote][/quote][/quote]

Congrat's, you get 1st prize as the classiest Sidwell parent this year.[/quote]



That is a creepy post. No I cannot imagine an STA boy reciting a poem about classmates on BJ's etc at Chapel and/or distributing it at school as an official Holiday document. Nor can I imagine an STA student throwing hard candy at administrators.

The "STA boys are too busy" comment is what teenagers say (and teenaged boys, to be specific), not any parent--even an angry defensive Sidwell parent. Kids do read this site.
I guess Sidwell parents run the show. What an unsuitable environment if you don't have a kid that fits into the school cover up for wealthy piece of garbage kid sort of place.

[/quote]

[Anonymous]

Sorry, tried to post but got tangled up in prior quotation.

Re: the "STA boys are too busy comment," that sounds like something said by a teenager, not a parent. Students read these sites so it is not a safe assumption that a post is from an adult just because the site is called "DC Urban Moms"!

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous]Sorry, tried to post but got tangled up in prior quotation.

Re: the "STA boys are too busy comment," that sounds like something said by a teenager, not a parent. Students read these sites so it is not a safe assumption that a post is from an adult just because the site is called "DC Urban Moms"![/quote]

If it is a teen, it is a teen who has been raised that this type of homophobic commnet is acceptable.

[Anonymous]

Could be, 15:24, but you would probably be unhappily surprised by how many teenaged children of progressive/liberal parents still make that kind of put-down. Maybe it's about sounding hyper-masculine, I don't know, but it is a sad reality.

[Anonymous]

Sorry, I don't accept the "boys will be boys" excuse . Not in an envirnoment where young adults who don't fit the heterosexual mold are killing themselves is it OK to suggest that boys at a particualr school are "less" because the reason that they don't engage in mysoginy in because they are gay.True all schools have their trouble makers, but is it not true that the entire senior class engaged in this walk out, that they all accepted the mysoginistic poem in a group think sort of way . Am I alone in thinking that a Quaker school with such strict admission criteria should have a better "end product" than that ? Or is like I see over and over on Sidwell posts:" its the IVY placement rates we care about"?

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous]Could be, 15:24, but you would probably be unhappily surprised by how many teenaged children of progressive/liberal parents still make that kind of put-down. Maybe it's about sounding hyper-masculine, I don't know, but it is a sad reality.[/quote]

If the same teen made an antisemetic remark or used the N word would you suggest THAT was ok too because he was just compensating after all??

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous]
Not just at a "school function" but inside the Meeting House; a clear act of dissrespect. Can you imagine a St Alban's boy conceiving of something like this inside the National Cathedral ?? Have the parents of these young adults made a formal apology to the Meeting ?

STA boys are too busy giving each other blowjobs.

[/quote][/quote][/quote]
poster of the blow job comment: there seems to be a lot of specualtion on DCUM about whether you are a Sidwell parent or the glorious product of a $420,000 investment in your education and enlightenment. Perhaps you'd like to divulge before any more parents get out their check books.

[Anonymous]

this is an interesting thread but you guys are giving me a migraine. What is so hard about learning to properly use the quotation function?

[Anonymous]

In my experience the term "boy" as in "STA boy" is used by adults to refer to someone of a younger generation. I've never met a teenage boy who refered to an age mate as a "boy". In fact, I think all teenagers now refer to each other (girls and boys equally) as 'dude" . LOL.

[Anonymous]

Reading this thread is a bit like watching a group of preschoolers play "telephone" - lots of mistranslations, assumptions, and repeating of mistranslations, with very little actual content in the end!

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous]A few comments to try to clarify things:
1. The nasty poem was not read at Meeting nor was the hard copy of it passed out at Meeting. I believe one of the early posters said this was something read at a concert. Don't get me wrong--it was indeed ugly--but it is not part of the discussion about Meeting.
2. As I understand it, there is a tradition of seniors singing Jingle Bells at the final pre-winter break Meeting, and having a "Santa" from the senior class throw out candy. What was different this year is that the seniors didn't wait till the end--they did the singing then walked out as Meeting continued. And some seniors did forcefully throw candy "at" administrators--the Headmaster said this during Meeting.
3. The anti-St. Albans crack sounds a lot like something a teenage boy would write, not a parent (even a defensive parent).
4. I don't like what I heard but agree with those who say that the school should have the chance to rein in bad behavior and it is not a Sign of The Apocalypse.
5. I do note a lot of Schadenfreud towards Sidwell on this Board--yes, of the same type seen when other schools get bad publicity. Anyone associated with schools will, if they are honest, admit that bad behavior can go on at any of these schools and yes, sometimes particular groups of kids or a grade have a negative dynamic. See Landon Maureen [/quote]

No shadenfreude here, just wishing the school would do what needs to be done to return to its Quaker roots.You only admonish those from whom you expect more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:this is an interesting thread but you guys are giving me a migraine. What is so hard about learning to properly use the quotation function?

http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/141163.page

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Could be, 15:24, but you would probably be unhappily surprised by how many teenaged children of progressive/liberal parents still make that kind of put-down. Maybe it's about sounding hyper-masculine, I don't know, but it is a sad reality.[/quote]

If the same teen made an antisemetic remark or used the N word would you suggest THAT was ok too because he was just compensating after all?? [/quote]
I am not suggesting it is okay; rather, that it is not only teens raised in an overtly homophobic environment who make comments like that. Such comments are more common than you think--it is a depressing reality, not an acceptable practice.

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous]Sorry, I don't accept the "boys will be boys" excuse . Not in an envirnoment where young adults who don't fit the heterosexual mold are killing themselves is it OK to suggest that boys at a particualr school are "less" because the reason that they don't engage in mysoginy in because they are gay.True all schools have their trouble makers, but is it not true that the entire senior class engaged in this walk out, that they all accepted the mysoginistic poem in a group think sort of way . Am I alone in thinking that a Quaker school with such strict admission criteria should have a better "end product" than that ? Or is like I see over and over on Sidwell posts:" its the IVY placement rates we care about"?[/quote]
Should also point out that senior girls seemed quite on board with nasty attacks on girls in the younger classes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Reading this thread is a bit like watching a group of preschoolers play "telephone" - lots of mistranslations, assumptions, and repeating of mistranslations, with very little actual content in the end!

Actually, the facts seem pretty clear; especially for DCUM.