Not sure what "both issues" you are referring to. So maybe they don't meet the narrow us legal definition of human trafficking. They are still terrible people. Could you imagine being that kid and finding out what happened to you? That your parents were capable of deceit and trickery to manipulate others to get whatever they wanted. It would make me question my parents and my relationship with them and I would most certainly distance myself. I would also be suspect of them at all times after finding that out. I would wonder what other things they had done. Everything thinks its no big deal bc she is a baby. Duh, babies grow into adults. |
The Masts are attempting to kidnap someone’s child. The fact that you excuse that is horrifying. |
That's what makes this story really pernicious. In some of the ICWA, at least the child was actually placed with the family in most cases, so they had some sort of relationship. This is literally just, they believed they were entitled to this baby. |
A real-life Gone, Baby, Gone |
Wow, the details in that WaPo story are just crazy. The American family sounds completely calculated, manipulative and sociopathic. |
Where does it say the lawyer Mast had never seen the baby in Afghanistan?
Why did he want this baby so much? He should've stepped aside 3 months after starting this when the Red Cross found the baby's family. |
Masts would be Gilead commanders for sure. We need to keep these Christian baby stealing people out of power. |
Bullshat. The Masts are nothing more than a zealots who think they are better than others. Reminds me of those Christian missionaries who go into other countries causing more havoc and hell before their arrival as they withhold medicine and food unless they can convert you to their religion. |
+1 |
I agree, why was he like a dog without a bone about this child? That alone is concerning, and then there is the lying, perjury, kidnapping, etc. Are the marines looking into his behavior? What horrible people. |
Ugh, WITH a bone, not without |
And they have multiple children already - the Wapo article references their "sons." This was all to get a girl? Or to fulfill some bizarre Christian commandment to adopt? Make it make sense. |
I’m confused how an US court can grant guardianship of a child that wasn’t American or on American soil. |
“The baby had been rescued two years earlier from the rubble of a U.S. military raid that killed her parents and five siblings. After months in a U.S. military hospital, she had gone to live with her cousin and his wife, this newlywed couple. Now, the family was bound for the United States for further medical treatment, with the aid of U.S. Marine Corps attorney Joshua Mast. When the exhausted Afghans arrived at the airport in Washington, D.C., in late August 2021, Mast pulled them out of the international arrivals line and led them to an inspecting officer, according to a lawsuit they filed last month. They were surprised when Mast presented an Afghan passport for the child, the couple said. But it was the last name printed on the document that stopped them cold: Mast. They didn’t know it, but they would soon lose their baby. This is a story about how one U.S. Marine became fiercely determined to bring home an Afghan war orphan, and praised it as an act of Christian faith to save her. Letters, emails and documents submitted in federal filings show that he used his status in the U.S. Armed Forces, appealed to high-ranking Trump administration officials and turned to small-town courts to adopt the baby, unbeknownst to the Afghan couple raising her 7,000 miles (11,000 kilometers) away.” The whole story is bonkers. https://apnews.com/article/afghan-baby-us-marine-custody-battle-b157557538b84b288a0a8415735e24ab |
If you read the initial complaint, the absurdity of the absence of any basis for the Masts to have a legitimate claim to custody or for Fluvanna County to have jurisdiction is totally nuts. The Afghan couple appears to be represented by very good attorneys at Hunton, so hopefully they stand a good chance of prevailing. |