Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:… presumably they are thinking long term with the rigor comment
There is no way they can know at 3 years old how much rigor will be appropriate in high school.
Sure, but you can at least want the options available. Not OP, but for example I personally wouldn't pick a K-8 or K-12 that didn't at least have the option for geometry in eighth, which is the case for some area privates. Sure maybe my kid will end up in algebra 1 anyway, but I'd hate to not have the option if she's a strong math student.
Is geometry in 8th typical for a strong student? My kids are young so I’m just starting to think about all of this. I went to public school but I took algebra I in 8th, which at the time was the advanced track option. I took calc bc in 12th. Genuinely curious if norms have changed or if I just didn’t have any idea what was out there at the time, etc.
It is going to depend pretty strongly on the part of the US you are in, but in this area, public school grade-level track is Algebra I in 8th grade, which puts a child in Calculus AB or BC in their senior year.
However, there's a pretty big swathe of kids who do Algebra I in 7th grade and Geometry in 8th. How many kids that is will depend on the school. In the wealthiest schools, it is almost all. In the least wealthy schools, it is probably less then half.
At any rate, that's the norm for public schools. The norm for private schools is to have many more kids on the "grade level" track, to go deeper, and to only accelerate the very mathiest of kids. That's also a fine approach, but it does sometimes create a situation when private school kids apply to public magnets, as they will sometimes need to "make up" a year of math over the summer to be on track with the other "smart kids."