Men, be honest, if your wife was fat

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here is a better photo

Ok. This picture is an older picture of you, at least 5 years. In this photo, you appear to be an 8/10. In the first picture, you are a very fit 12/14. You posted that you are 26yo, enjoy your figure. After having kids/turning 40, you will look VERY different at the same weight/clothing size.

PP I agree with you since the legs are definitely slimmer.

Your last point however might be the norm it is not an absolute.

I was tactfully informing her that she has about 10 years until her breasts will be sitting at her waist. That will happen regardless of reproducing. Gravity is a bitch!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here is a better photo

You need to stop with the pictures. This is embarrassing. The thread was not about YOU and you've already succeeded in getting the middle aged sexless marriage dads to slobber over you. Come on now. Go back to Tinder with this.

I like what I see, but I'm afraid I can't make any truly valid judgments without a naked pic.

Signed,

Middle Aged Sexless Marriage Dad

please please, another Middle Aged Sexless Marriage Dad

you look gorgeous

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here is a better photo

You need to stop with the pictures. This is embarrassing. The thread was not about YOU and you've already succeeded in getting the middle aged sexless marriage dads to slobber over you. Come on now. Go back to Tinder with this.

I like what I see, but I'm afraid I can't make any truly valid judgments without a naked pic.

Signed,

Middle Aged Sexless Marriage Dad

please please, another Middle Aged Sexless Marriage Dad

you look gorgeous

Wow! You are such a desperate loser!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here is a better photo

Ok. This picture is an older picture of you, at least 5 years. In this photo, you appear to be an 8/10. In the first picture, you are a very fit 12/14. You posted that you are 26yo, enjoy your figure. After having kids/turning 40, you will look VERY different at the same weight/clothing size.

PP I agree with you since the legs are definitely slimmer.

Your last point however might be the norm it is not an absolute.

I was tactfully informing her that she has about 10 years until her breasts will be sitting at her waist. That will happen regardless of reproducing. Gravity is a bitch!

Plus, there is likely a butterface situation going on under that flower!

[Anonymous]

NP. Hey guys posting in support of the beautiful pictures -- it's always lovely to see that people exist, even when some catty posters want to deny them.

I bet the picture poster turns heads all. the. time.

But cattiness? You do you, girl.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Go look at statues of fertility goddesses and Aphrodites. They all have full thighs, bellies, butts. This American obsession with adult women looking like adolescent boys is insane. If you really want an adolescent boy, go get yourself one.

Ridiculous. I am 50 years old. Five grown children. 5'5 and 117 pounds. With measurements of 34/24/34, I promise you I do not look like an adolescent boy. You can be fit and still look very feminine.

And so humble.

There is nothing wrong with what PP wrote. The average size in the US might be larger, but that doesn't mean it is healthy. It also doesn't mean that anyone isn't the "average" size is unattractive or less feminine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here is a better photo

Ok. This picture is an older picture of you, at least 5 years. In this photo, you appear to be an 8/10. In the first picture, you are a very fit 12/14. You posted that you are 26yo, enjoy your figure. After having kids/turning 40, you will look VERY different at the same weight/clothing size.

PP I agree with you since the legs are definitely slimmer.

Your last point however might be the norm it is not an absolute.

I was tactfully informing her that she has about 10 years until her breasts will be sitting at her waist. That will happen regardless of reproducing. Gravity is a bitch!

Stop scaring the girl! 26+10=36. I'm 38 (2 kids) and can assure you that my breasts are nowhere near my waist.

[Anonymous]

Seriously, 39 here with one kid and look a little softer than i did at 24, but honestly not by that much. I'm a size 0/2 and have a "teenage boy" body. Thanks to all the PPs who basically say I have no chance of being attractive to anyone. (Thankfully my real life proves them wrong.)

A PP said this already but it bears repeating: there are beautiful women of many shapes and sizes. Discussing the perfect dimensions totally misses to point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Size 2-4.

There are lots of moms that size. I see them driving range rovers all the time

I am 5'7 and 118 lbs. I wear a size 27 jean. When I raise my arms over my head, you can see my ribs clearly outlined. I have a small B cup chest.

Honestly, that is more attractive to men than a size 12/14? I'd like to think not.

[Anonymous]

The women I know who are over 40 who do not have saggy boobs are the small breasted, those with implants and those who had breast lifts. Naturally large breasts are heavy. Time and gravity do a number on them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Size 2-4.

There are lots of moms that size. I see them driving range rovers all the time

I am 5'7 and 118 lbs. I wear a size 27 jean. When I raise my arms over my head, you can see my ribs clearly outlined. I have a small B cup chest.

Honestly, that is more attractive to men than a size 12/14? I'd like to think not.

wow! You have poor self esteem!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The women I know who are over 40 who do not have saggy boobs are the small breasted, those with implants and those who had breast lifts. Naturally large breasts are heavy. Time and gravity do a number on them.

Are you an OB/Gyn? How often are you looking at women's breasts?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm the PP that posted the photo. I am 26 years old, 5'9" 200 lbs, and pretty active. My doctors always tell me that I don't look like I weigh that much.

I believed you up until now. BS on the doctor comments for sure. You won't find many doctors willing to say such a thing to a patient. Pure BS.
Some dude is trolling hard.

I weigh 160 at 5 ft 2./My doctor had no problem expressing surprise when I stepped on the scale. They are not the swamis at the carnival guessing weight. Doctors can be wrong at eyeballing weight, easy.

Where do you find the doctor who is present when you step on the scale? From my experiences, it is only nurse who do the weighting job.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The women I know who are over 40 who do not have saggy boobs are the small breasted, those with implants and those who had breast lifts. Naturally large breasts are heavy. Time and gravity do a number on them.

Are you an OB/Gyn? How often are you looking at women's breasts?

DP here, but I see other women's breasts weekly at the sauna. What is the big deal? Do you think only OB/GYN sees boobs regularly?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Size 2-4.

There are lots of moms that size. I see them driving range rovers all the time

I am 5'7 and 118 lbs. I wear a size 27 jean. When I raise my arms over my head, you can see my ribs clearly outlined. I have a small B cup chest.

Honestly, that is more attractive to men than a size 12/14? I'd like to think not.

wow! You have poor self esteem!

Why do you say that?