To those upset at Trump over child separation

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^

Follow the fricking law ........... I did not vote for Trump but he is spot on in trying to stop this influx of illegals.

There is no "influx of illegals". These are people, humans, who are fleeing cartels who are ravaging their country in great part fueled by US drug consumption. Stuff it.

Actually many of the cartels have moved from drugs to human trafficking. Much more money sneaking illegals in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^

Follow the fricking law ........... I did not vote for Trump but he is spot on in trying to stop this influx of illegals.

There is no "influx of illegals". These are people, humans, who are fleeing cartels who are ravaging their country in great part fueled by US drug consumption. Stuff it.

Actually many of the cartels have moved from drugs to human trafficking. Much more money sneaking illegals in.

Please provide evidence that major cartels have moved to human trafficking. Citation please.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^

Follow the fricking law ........... I did not vote for Trump but he is spot on in trying to stop this influx of illegals.

There is no "influx of illegals". These are people, humans, who are fleeing cartels who are ravaging their country in great part fueled by US drug consumption. Stuff it.

Actually many of the cartels have moved from drugs to human trafficking. Much more money sneaking illegals in.

Please provide evidence that major cartels have moved to human trafficking. Citation please.

Not the pp, but this is not new.

2016: http://www.abc.net.au/triplej/programs/hack/sex-trafficking-booming-mexican-drug-lords-expand-business/7217490
2015: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/ana-davila/drug-cartels-where-human-trafficking-and-human-smuggling-meet-today_b_7588408.html
2017: https://www.cnn.com/2017/07/28/us/migrant-deaths-and-human-trafficking-by-the-numbers/index.html

Google has plenty of other citations. You ought to try it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If only Democrats would follow the law instead of playing identity politics we'd actually see some progress.

Says the person who voted for Crooked Trump.

[Anonymous]

The Trump Administration told us they were going to do this in December, 2017

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/politics/ct-trump-immigrants-parents-children-20171221-story.html

To now claim it was the Dems, or its on the Congress is just a blatant lie.

[Anonymous]

What should be done with children taken into custody at border?
(A) Put in Jail with Parents
(B) Turn them loose on streets of USA
(C)Send them back across border alone
(D)Take into custody in facility in USA

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What should be done with children taken into custody at border?
(A) Put in Jail with Parents
(B) Turn them loose on streets of USA
(C)Send them back across border alone
(D)Take into custody in facility in USA

Liberal answer: grant amnesty to both the parents and the children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Trump Administration told us they were going to do this in December, 2017

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/politics/ct-trump-immigrants-parents-children-20171221-story.html

To now claim it was the Dems, or its on the Congress is just a blatant lie.

Actually they've been considering it since shortly after Trump became President.

Here's John Kelly talking about separating families in March 2017 - https://www.cnn.com/2017/03/06/politics/john-kelly-separating-children-from-parents-immigration-border/index.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do I understand correctly that the children being separated are in those instances where their parents, attempting to violate immigration law, snuck over the border, were caught, and are now pleading asylum? Are the parents free at that point to say, effectively, "OK, you caught me violating your laws. My children and I will stay together and return home." ? Of are they not given that choice?

DP, moderate. The parents don’t have the option to turn around, as I understand it. Someone will correct me identify I’m wrong, I’m sure.

THANK YOU. Nicer response than the hater above, calling me a moron and a GD liar. If the parents cannot turn around, I have more sympathy, but the parents need to be more responsible knowing this is likely to happen. I blame the parents.

Also, from what I understand, they are separating children when they cannot determine the true familial relationship, and they are catching thousands of adults with children not their own.

Moron.

Liberal hater and idiot.

DP from the above.
YOU are the worthless fool typing out your flawed thesis when you didn’t know that BP is refusing to let asylum seekers at legal points of entry.

I’m the original Moderate DP in this post chain.. I did not write the above. Not sure why your point couldn’t have been made without lying about who you were? It’s anonymous..

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What should be done with children taken into custody at border?
(A) Put in Jail with Parents
(B) Turn them loose on streets of USA
(C)Send them back across border alone
(D)Take into custody in facility in USA

Liberal answer: grant amnesty to both the parents and the children.

Conservative answer: jail everybody except POTUS and his co-conspirators, even if that requires putting children in cages because their parents are alleged to have commmitted a misdemeanor in an attempt to seek a better life for their children through the amnesty process.

GOP = F*cking animals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do I understand correctly that the children being separated are in those instances where their parents, attempting to violate immigration law, snuck over the border, were caught, and are now pleading asylum? Are the parents free at that point to say, effectively, "OK, you caught me violating your laws. My children and I will stay together and return home." ? Of are they not given that choice?

DP, moderate. The parents don’t have the option to turn around, as I understand it. Someone will correct me identify I’m wrong, I’m sure.

THANK YOU. Nicer response than the hater above, calling me a moron and a GD liar. If the parents cannot turn around, I have more sympathy, but the parents need to be more responsible knowing this is likely to happen. I blame the parents.

Also, from what I understand, they are separating children when they cannot determine the true familial relationship, and they are catching thousands of adults with children not their own.

Moron.

Liberal hater and idiot.

DP from the above.
YOU are the worthless fool typing out your flawed thesis when you didn’t know that BP is refusing to let asylum seekers at legal points of entry.

I’m the original Moderate DP in this post chain.. I did not write the above. Not sure why your point couldn’t have been made without lying about who you were? It’s anonymous..

This is totally confusing. Who is lying about who they are? Obviously, the hateful liberal is accusing me of that, but she has me confused with someone else. Rather than admit she conflated (at least) two different posters, she's doubling down on her name-calling and insults. Are you now also saying I'm lying about who I am? We have multiple ps others on this thread, bringing up very valid points.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What should be done with children taken into custody at border?
(A) Put in Jail with Parents
(B) Turn them loose on streets of USA
(C)Send them back across border alone
(D)Take into custody in facility in USA

Liberal answer: grant amnesty to both the parents and the children.

Conservative answer: jail everybody except POTUS and his co-conspirators, even if that requires putting children in cages because their parents are alleged to have commmitted a misdemeanor in an attempt to seek a better life for their children through the amnesty process.

GOP = F*cking animals.

I think the MS-13 are the animals.

Also, Obama had kids in cages. Did you consider him an animal?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What should be done with children taken into custody at border?
(A) Put in Jail with Parents
(B) Turn them loose on streets of USA
(C)Send them back across border alone
(D)Take into custody in facility in USA

The answer is D, but then again, I'm not a crazy liberal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do I understand correctly that the children being separated are in those instances where their parents, attempting to violate immigration law, snuck over the border, were caught, and are now pleading asylum? Are the parents free at that point to say, effectively, "OK, you caught me violating your laws. My children and I will stay together and return home." ? Of are they not given that choice?

DP, moderate. The parents don’t have the option to turn around, as I understand it. Someone will correct me identify I’m wrong, I’m sure.

THANK YOU. Nicer response than the hater above, calling me a moron and a GD liar. If the parents cannot turn around, I have more sympathy, but the parents need to be more responsible knowing this is likely to happen. I blame the parents.

Also, from what I understand, they are separating children when they cannot determine the true familial relationship, and they are catching thousands of adults with children not their own.

Moron.

Liberal hater and idiot.

DP from the above.
YOU are the worthless fool typing out your flawed thesis when you didn’t know that BP is refusing to let asylum seekers at legal points of entry.

I’m the original Moderate DP in this post chain.. I did not write the above. Not sure why your point couldn’t have been made without lying about who you were? It’s anonymous..

DP is not your particular identity, you ridiculous fool. It’s a Different Poster bothering to tell the truth by explaining one is not a particular poster.

[Anonymous]

The ProPublica audio is absolutely damning.

All of you effectively laughing about this- it’s just a stain on your souls.