War on Women

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I will always be pro choice as I was lucky d ouch to be able to receive an abortion at age 21.

However, I don't think any amount of arguing, sincere debate, angry retorts or anything in between will convince those who want to see about toon outlawed and who deem abortion to be immoral. This is such an emotionally driven issue. Unfortunately, even if a pro lifer personally found the need to have or their loved ones needed to have an abortion, they will continue often to continue their beliefs.

I think the best way to be is to continue supporting pro choice movement, clinics and such through politically and financially supporting as much as possible the pro choice rights that should be afforded every American. Every donation I'm able to make always goes to Planned Parenthood. To me, they were my lifesaver when I needed it. I would encourage and stress that it's so important to financially support such institutions.

I'm done trying to convince those who disagree with me on this issue ti change their minds. Accept their ignorance and stupidity and let's work on saving the freedoms we need for women.

The best thing would have been for Biden and senate democrats to care more about judicial appointments. The fact that there is a lone trump appointee as the only judge in Amarillo Texas makes judge shopping a joke. If Kacsmaryk had to share the court house with a Biden appointee or two, none of the federal lawsuits would go anywhere

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I will always be pro choice as I was lucky d ouch to be able to receive an abortion at age 21.

However, I don't think any amount of arguing, sincere debate, angry retorts or anything in between will convince those who want to see about toon outlawed and who deem abortion to be immoral. This is such an emotionally driven issue. Unfortunately, even if a pro lifer personally found the need to have or their loved ones needed to have an abortion, they will continue often to continue their beliefs.

I think the best way to be is to continue supporting pro choice movement, clinics and such through politically and financially supporting as much as possible the pro choice rights that should be afforded every American. Every donation I'm able to make always goes to Planned Parenthood. To me, they were my lifesaver when I needed it. I would encourage and stress that it's so important to financially support such institutions.

I'm done trying to convince those who disagree with me on this issue ti change their minds. Accept their ignorance and stupidity and let's work on saving the freedoms we need for women.

The best thing would have been for Biden and senate democrats to care more about judicial appointments. The fact that there is a lone trump appointee as the only judge in Amarillo Texas makes judge shopping a joke. If Kacsmaryk had to share the court house with a Biden appointee or two, none of the federal lawsuits would go anywhere

“"Since vacancies have been much lower under Biden than under Trump, the fact that Biden's appointment pace is faster means that his nominations team, and Senate Democrats on and off the Judiciary Committee, have been prioritizing judicial appointments," Jipping told ABC News. […] Because Democrats expanded their Senate majority to 51 seats in the 2022 midterms, they also now hold an outright majority on the Judiciary Committee rather than an even split with Republicans, which will make it easier for them to vote on and approve nominees.” https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/biden-appointed-105-federal-judges-outpacing-trump-obama/story?id=97200133

Plus, IIRC, the GOP did their usual terroristic “we don’t care what the voters said, we’re blocking everything we can” crap.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I will always be pro choice as I was lucky d ouch to be able to receive an abortion at age 21.

However, I don't think any amount of arguing, sincere debate, angry retorts or anything in between will convince those who want to see about toon outlawed and who deem abortion to be immoral. This is such an emotionally driven issue. Unfortunately, even if a pro lifer personally found the need to have or their loved ones needed to have an abortion, they will continue often to continue their beliefs.

I think the best way to be is to continue supporting pro choice movement, clinics and such through politically and financially supporting as much as possible the pro choice rights that should be afforded every American. Every donation I'm able to make always goes to Planned Parenthood. To me, they were my lifesaver when I needed it. I would encourage and stress that it's so important to financially support such institutions.

I'm done trying to convince those who disagree with me on this issue ti change their minds. Accept their ignorance and stupidity and let's work on saving the freedoms we need for women.

The best thing would have been for Biden and senate democrats to care more about judicial appointments. The fact that there is a lone trump appointee as the only judge in Amarillo Texas makes judge shopping a joke. If Kacsmaryk had to share the court house with a Biden appointee or two, none of the federal lawsuits would go anywhere

“"Since vacancies have been much lower under Biden than under Trump, the fact that Biden's appointment pace is faster means that his nominations team, and Senate Democrats on and off the Judiciary Committee, have been prioritizing judicial appointments," Jipping told ABC News. […] Because Democrats expanded their Senate majority to 51 seats in the 2022 midterms, they also now hold an outright majority on the Judiciary Committee rather than an even split with Republicans, which will make it easier for them to vote on and approve nominees.” https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/biden-appointed-105-federal-judges-outpacing-trump-obama/story?id=97200133

Plus, IIRC, the GOP did their usual terroristic “we don’t care what the voters said, we’re blocking everything we can” crap.

OK. The fact remains that there is a lone federal judge in a court house and anyone who wants to ensure that they get the most conservative ruling imaginable just has to file in Amarillo

[Anonymous]

Wtf Texas? Take back your state and have some repost for the women of Texas and everywhere else.

[Anonymous]

Respect*

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I will always be pro choice as I was lucky d ouch to be able to receive an abortion at age 21.

However, I don't think any amount of arguing, sincere debate, angry retorts or anything in between will convince those who want to see about toon outlawed and who deem abortion to be immoral. This is such an emotionally driven issue. Unfortunately, even if a pro lifer personally found the need to have or their loved ones needed to have an abortion, they will continue often to continue their beliefs.

I think the best way to be is to continue supporting pro choice movement, clinics and such through politically and financially supporting as much as possible the pro choice rights that should be afforded every American. Every donation I'm able to make always goes to Planned Parenthood. To me, they were my lifesaver when I needed it. I would encourage and stress that it's so important to financially support such institutions.

I'm done trying to convince those who disagree with me on this issue ti change their minds. Accept their ignorance and stupidity and let's work on saving the freedoms we need for women.

The best thing would have been for Biden and senate democrats to care more about judicial appointments. The fact that there is a lone trump appointee as the only judge in Amarillo Texas makes judge shopping a joke. If Kacsmaryk had to share the court house with a Biden appointee or two, none of the federal lawsuits would go anywhere

“"Since vacancies have been much lower under Biden than under Trump, the fact that Biden's appointment pace is faster means that his nominations team, and Senate Democrats on and off the Judiciary Committee, have been prioritizing judicial appointments," Jipping told ABC News. […] Because Democrats expanded their Senate majority to 51 seats in the 2022 midterms, they also now hold an outright majority on the Judiciary Committee rather than an even split with Republicans, which will make it easier for them to vote on and approve nominees.” https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/biden-appointed-105-federal-judges-outpacing-trump-obama/story?id=97200133

Plus, IIRC, the GOP did their usual terroristic “we don’t care what the voters said, we’re blocking everything we can” crap.

OK. The fact remains that there is a lone federal judge in a court house and anyone who wants to ensure that they get the most conservative ruling imaginable just has to file in Amarillo

I don't think you understand how the federal courts work.

[Anonymous]

Medication abortion is now banned by law in Wyoming, and punishable by prison terms and fines.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/17/wyoming-abortion-laws-pill-mifepristone/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Medication abortion is now banned by law in Wyoming, and punishable by prison terms and fines.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/03/17/wyoming-abortion-laws-pill-mifepristone/

There’s going to be so much FAAFO for some conservative women in forced birther states, but I guess they’ll enjoy it so long as the law is applied to non-White women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I will always be pro choice as I was lucky d ouch to be able to receive an abortion at age 21.

However, I don't think any amount of arguing, sincere debate, angry retorts or anything in between will convince those who want to see about toon outlawed and who deem abortion to be immoral. This is such an emotionally driven issue. Unfortunately, even if a pro lifer personally found the need to have or their loved ones needed to have an abortion, they will continue often to continue their beliefs.

I think the best way to be is to continue supporting pro choice movement, clinics and such through politically and financially supporting as much as possible the pro choice rights that should be afforded every American. Every donation I'm able to make always goes to Planned Parenthood. To me, they were my lifesaver when I needed it. I would encourage and stress that it's so important to financially support such institutions.

I'm done trying to convince those who disagree with me on this issue ti change their minds. Accept their ignorance and stupidity and let's work on saving the freedoms we need for women.

The best thing would have been for Biden and senate democrats to care more about judicial appointments. The fact that there is a lone trump appointee as the only judge in Amarillo Texas makes judge shopping a joke. If Kacsmaryk had to share the court house with a Biden appointee or two, none of the federal lawsuits would go anywhere

“"Since vacancies have been much lower under Biden than under Trump, the fact that Biden's appointment pace is faster means that his nominations team, and Senate Democrats on and off the Judiciary Committee, have been prioritizing judicial appointments," Jipping told ABC News. […] Because Democrats expanded their Senate majority to 51 seats in the 2022 midterms, they also now hold an outright majority on the Judiciary Committee rather than an even split with Republicans, which will make it easier for them to vote on and approve nominees.” https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/biden-appointed-105-federal-judges-outpacing-trump-obama/story?id=97200133

Plus, IIRC, the GOP did their usual terroristic “we don’t care what the voters said, we’re blocking everything we can” crap.

OK. The fact remains that there is a lone federal judge in a court house and anyone who wants to ensure that they get the most conservative ruling imaginable just has to file in Amarillo

Chief Justice Roberts appears to be trying to put a stop to this.

“It’s always hard for me to think that anything the Judicial Conference does is a big piece of news, but they did announce a new policy that sets out to curb judge-shopping. It’s the Conference trying to say: “Hey, you can’t just go to the casino that is Amarillo, Texas, and get Matthew Kacsmaryk every time you file a case.”

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2024/03/john-roberts-matthew-kacsmaryk-nationwide-injunctions-judge-shopping.html

https://www.uscourts.gov/news/2024/03/12/conference-acts-promote-random-case-assignment?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=usc-news

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/24483622/judicial-conference-policy.pdf

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I will always be pro choice as I was lucky d ouch to be able to receive an abortion at age 21.

However, I don't think any amount of arguing, sincere debate, angry retorts or anything in between will convince those who want to see about toon outlawed and who deem abortion to be immoral. This is such an emotionally driven issue. Unfortunately, even if a pro lifer personally found the need to have or their loved ones needed to have an abortion, they will continue often to continue their beliefs.

I think the best way to be is to continue supporting pro choice movement, clinics and such through politically and financially supporting as much as possible the pro choice rights that should be afforded every American. Every donation I'm able to make always goes to Planned Parenthood. To me, they were my lifesaver when I needed it. I would encourage and stress that it's so important to financially support such institutions.

I'm done trying to convince those who disagree with me on this issue ti change their minds. Accept their ignorance and stupidity and let's work on saving the freedoms we need for women.

The best thing would have been for Biden and senate democrats to care more about judicial appointments. The fact that there is a lone trump appointee as the only judge in Amarillo Texas makes judge shopping a joke. If Kacsmaryk had to share the court house with a Biden appointee or two, none of the federal lawsuits would go anywhere

“"Since vacancies have been much lower under Biden than under Trump, the fact that Biden's appointment pace is faster means that his nominations team, and Senate Democrats on and off the Judiciary Committee, have been prioritizing judicial appointments," Jipping told ABC News. […] Because Democrats expanded their Senate majority to 51 seats in the 2022 midterms, they also now hold an outright majority on the Judiciary Committee rather than an even split with Republicans, which will make it easier for them to vote on and approve nominees.” https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/biden-appointed-105-federal-judges-outpacing-trump-obama/story?id=97200133

Plus, IIRC, the GOP did their usual terroristic “we don’t care what the voters said, we’re blocking everything we can” crap.

OK. The fact remains that there is a lone federal judge in a court house and anyone who wants to ensure that they get the most conservative ruling imaginable just has to file in Amarillo

Chief Justice Roberts appears to be trying to put a stop to this.

“It’s always hard for me to think that anything the Judicial Conference does is a big piece of news, but they did announce a new policy that sets out to curb judge-shopping. It’s the Conference trying to say: “Hey, you can’t just go to the casino that is Amarillo, Texas, and get Matthew Kacsmaryk every time you file a case.”

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2024/03/john-roberts-matthew-kacsmaryk-nationwide-injunctions-judge-shopping.html

https://www.uscourts.gov/news/2024/03/12/conference-acts-promote-random-case-assignment?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=usc-news

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/24483622/judicial-conference-policy.pdf

OMG this appears to be working. Trump-appointed Judge Mark Pittman in Texas has sent the Chamber of Commerce's challenge to the CFPB's credit card fee rule to D.C.
"Venue is not a continental breakfast; you cannot pick and choose on a plaintiffs' whim where and how a lawsuit is filed."

https://www.reuters.com/legal/texas-judge-transfers-lawsuit-over-card-fees-washington-dc-2024-03-28/

[Anonymous]

Does this mean any time a woman has a miscarriage she is looking at prison time for manslaughter? She is pregnant and slips on ice and loses the baby, prison time! She should have been more careful and lived at home in a bubble.

[Anonymous]

Trump said it..."there has to be punishment". Women that miscarry and lose a pregnancy are as good as murderers. Punish them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does this mean any time a woman has a miscarriage she is looking at prison time for manslaughter? She is pregnant and slips on ice and loses the baby, prison time! She should have been more careful and lived at home in a bubble.

There is already precedent for this (forced birthers have been trying to get fetal personhood established for years). It’s just that it’s been applied mostly to poor and/or minority women and only been picked up by feminist media so it hasn’t gotten wider traction. But yes forced birther politicians and the forced birther crazies who spur them ever crazier have indicated that they would be fine with this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Liberal women. So miserable, it’s understandable why abortion is your only issue.

I find it odd that as a woman, I am supposed to ignore everything except "women's issues" like abortion. I'm a lot more affected by crime, border security, and the economy than I am by abortion. I just don't believe that the average woman is having so many abortions that it's the only issue they care about.

It goes way beyond abortion. But you know that and are playing dumb.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Liberal women. So miserable, it’s understandable why abortion is your only issue.

I find it odd that as a woman, I am supposed to ignore everything except "women's issues" like abortion. I'm a lot more affected by crime, border security, and the economy than I am by abortion. I just don't believe that the average woman is having so many abortions that it's the only issue they care about.

It goes way beyond abortion. But you know that and are playing dumb.

It does indeed go beyond abortion. Don’t forget the recent attempts to eradicate title IV protections for women and the subsequent silencing of women who speak out against it.