Well said! I wish I could pin this post to the top of the dcum md schools forum |
OK, but we don't have that here. Our housing choices are the product of government policy. |
DP: exactly, and years of that policy, and also things like family wealth, etc. To claim that everyone has the same choices in housing options is laughable. |
First your housing choices are a product of the market not the government. The government is not telling you where you can or can not live. Its a capitalist system. Ironically, a socialist system would be the one where government policy assigns you to live in certain areas. Second - you can certainly argue that family wealth is an unfair advantage to many people. However, this is not the role or responsibility of the school system to correct upon entry. The equalizing role that the school system can contribute is by providing a good education to anyone who walks in the door so that they can begin to earn their own wealth after graduation. If you want to get rid of family wealth because you think it creates an unfair socioeconomic balance then by all means advocate for a county tax that strips any new resident of any family wealth upon the first year residing in the county. You could also garnish forward wages for anyone reporting that their family assisted in paying for their college education.The county could them redistribute this money to the poor hispanic community. I doubt this would be very popular but the place to advocate for this is within the county council not the school system. Good luck, logic can be your friend if you use it. |
Let's test that. Go buy a property and start building whatever you want on it, however you want. (Also, you seem to have mixed up "socialist" with "dictatorial". There are plenty of socialist systems where people choose where to live. There are also plenty of ostensibly-free-market systems where the government tells you.) |
It is also not the school system’s job to keep boundaries static for the sale of property values.
|
I'd agree but then you can't turn around and try to bus higher performing kids from high value places into a low value/low performing school to bolster the rankings, increase property values and raise the SES of the original low in boundary areas. This is only displacing poor people and giving a quick win to MC/UMC whites who bought less expensive property. You also can't advocate to bus poor kids out of your cluster to bolster your own own property values. Your self interest is in raising your raising your property value at the expense of another area. Considering that the residents of the other area already paid the value for their property while you got a discount, you are basically hoping for a windfall at someone else's expense. This is human nature so don't feel bad but it has zero to do with educating anyone. Regardless it IS NOT the school system's job to manipulate who lives where or play into your real estate dreams, it is the school system's job to educate anyone who walks in the door. If MCPS would start focusing on teaching rather than game playing, it wouldn't get embroiled in the real estate nonsense. |
MCPS isn't embroiled in the real-estate nonsense. If you are, that's on you. |
+2 great points! |
Wait, are you arguing that anyone in favor of trying to desegregate the schools just wants to do it to increase their own property values?! I’m no psychologist, but that’s called projection. No, your primary concern may be your property values, but many other people — and MCPS, and the school board — are actually concerned with improving the outcomes for poor children. There are some very cynical people on here who seem to believe that everyone is just looking out for #1. |
The government certainly is telling people where they can live by how they approve development projects and the requirements that they put on developers. They make decisions on the sizes of houses and proportion of MPDUs, which determines the prices of the houses, which determines who can live where. People are acting like the school system is completely separate from the county council's business/development decisions. It is not. I recall watching BOE and County Council meetings back when they were dealing with the budget shortfalls in 2009/2010 after the housing crash. There was reference to the creation of the MSMC and rebuilding of Wheaton and Thomas Edison as part of a broader Wheaton/Aspen Hill revitalization program with aims to bring more business and bring up housing prices in the area in 20 years. The County government thinks long term (maybe not always effectively), and the schools are definitely part of that thinking. |
I've lost track of how this discussion relates to WJ and Woodward. |
The CIP comes out tomorrow, maybe there will be an actual answer about the timeline for Woodward, rather than speculation, in there. |
Some affluent DCUM people are worried that their property values may go down and their children may have to go to high school with children who are poor. That's how. |
Also they are angry that resources might be devoted to educating kids with less privilege instead of going to their own privileged children. Which is just SO unfair! ![]() |