Roy Moore the Pedophile

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:GOP Family Values
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/alabamas-willie-horton-moment-luther-strange-hits-roy-moore-over-dissent-in-child-sex-case/article/2635265

Stop it!
Be nice.

[Anonymous]

So, no blanket condemnation of Moore from the right?

Underaged girls aren't off limits?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Curious this is coming out now. Very curious.

Are you drunk or daft? Weinstein? Spacey? Hoffman?

Exactly - which makes it easy for someone who doesn’t want him elected to make accusations at this time.
Color me very skeptical.

So you'll give a pedophile the benefit of the doubt? No wonder they feel like they'll "get away with it." YOU allow it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So, no blanket condemnation of Moore from the right?

Underaged girls aren't off limits?

I would like some proof before condemnation.
All it takes is an allegation to destroy someone. And, the Dems know that.
All these years, and this person never spoke up? #notbelievingit

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Curious this is coming out now. Very curious.

That's politics. Roy Moore shouldn't have become a political crusader if he didn't want his dirty laundry aired out. #hubris

Or, perhaps the democratic candidate is showing his desperation.

Maybe...but this is a case of dirty laundry that is extremely relevant to his fitness for office. In general, I don't prefer making attack ads out of people's records, particularly in criminal justice...because there are a lot of nuances to those decisions. Patterns of how someone conducted their job, sure, but one off like the Luther Strange ad not so much.

But if Moore did assault that child, that's something voters should definitely know.

[Anonymous]

The Bsnnon Seal of Approval!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Curious this is coming out now. Very curious.

Are you drunk or daft? Weinstein? Spacey? Hoffman?

Exactly - which makes it easy for someone who doesn’t want him elected to make accusations at this time.
Color me very skeptical.

So you'll give a pedophile the benefit of the doubt? No wonder they feel like they'll "get away with it." YOU allow it.

And, you will condemn before you have any proof? Two words... Tawana Brawley

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, no blanket condemnation of Moore from the right?

Underaged girls aren't off limits?

I would like some proof before condemnation.
All it takes is an allegation to destroy someone. And, the Dems know that.
All these years, and this person never spoke up? #notbelievingit

#Complicit

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, no blanket condemnation of Moore from the right?

Underaged girls aren't off limits?

I would like some proof before condemnation.
All it takes is an allegation to destroy someone. And, the Dems know that.
All these years, and this person never spoke up? #notbelievingit

Did you not believe the victims of the Catholic priests either? Do you not currently believe the Weinstein allegations? Do you not think the fact that Moore might be elected to a national office might be relevant to why the alleged victim would choose now to speak up?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Curious this is coming out now. Very curious.

Are you drunk or daft? Weinstein? Spacey? Hoffman?

Exactly - which makes it easy for someone who doesn’t want him elected to make accusations at this time.
Color me very skeptical.

So you'll give a pedophile the benefit of the doubt? No wonder they feel like they'll "get away with it." YOU allow it.

And, you will condemn before you have any proof? Two words... Tawana Brawley

How predictable. How long before you slut-shame the 14 year old?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Curious this is coming out now. Very curious.

Are you drunk or daft? Weinstein? Spacey? Hoffman?

Exactly - which makes it easy for someone who doesn’t want him elected to make accusations at this time.
Color me very skeptical.

I color you disgustingly misogynistic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, no blanket condemnation of Moore from the right?

Underaged girls aren't off limits?

I would like some proof before condemnation.
All it takes is an allegation to destroy someone. And, the Dems know that.
All these years, and this person never spoke up? #notbelievingit

Did you say the same thing when it took years for Bill Clinton's accusers to come forward? It's not uncommon for victims of sexual abuse, especially minors to wait years before they come forward. Go talk to victims of sex abuse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, no blanket condemnation of Moore from the right?

Underaged girls aren't off limits?

I would like some proof before condemnation.
All it takes is an allegation to destroy someone. And, the Dems know that.
All these years, and this person never spoke up? #notbelievingit

I hope you don't have kids. And if you do, I hope they don't allow their friends around you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, no blanket condemnation of Moore from the right?

Underaged girls aren't off limits?

I would like some proof before condemnation.
All it takes is an allegation to destroy someone. And, the Dems know that.
All these years, and this person never spoke up? #notbelievingit

The Post article notes corroboration of the story as related in the 1980's.

So you take the word of a pedophile who ha twice been kicked off the bench and stole money from a "charity" than a bunch of women?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Curious this is coming out now. Very curious.

Are you drunk or daft? Weinstein? Spacey? Hoffman?

Exactly - which makes it easy for someone who doesn’t want him elected to make accusations at this time.
Color me very skeptical.

So you'll give a pedophile the benefit of the doubt? No wonder they feel like they'll "get away with it." YOU allow it.

And, you will condemn before you have any proof? Two words... Tawana Brawley

How predictable. How long before you slut-shame the 14 year old?

Well.. to be fair... it seems that some white Christian men think it's fine for 14 year old girls to be wives and engage in sex with men old enough to be their grandfathers, a la Jeff Warren's group.