No Collusion, But an Attempt to Undermine the Legitimacy of Our Democracy
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
He is going to sign the bill. |
Anonymous
A lot of innuendo there. Sessions seems to have forgotten some inconsequential meetings. He is an older guy. That is plausible. Donald Jr. provided accurate but incomplete information to the NY Times. That is not a crime. A lot of people were brought in through the back door for Trump Tower. Nothing wrong with being discreet. Not everyone wants to be photographed by the media. Trump apparently chatted with Putin at a large dinner event when he was going to get Melania. That is hardly a secret meeting. Trump is the president. He can share information with foreign leaders if he deems it appropriate. Mueller is reportedly looking at the financial issues. There is still zero evidence of collusion. |
Anonymous
No, they are "forgetting" consequential meetings as well. It's not plausible. And no, they aren't just telling half truths or omitting things - they are LYING and COVERING UP with fake cover stories, i.e. "Russian adoptions" - also not plausible. We are well beyond any possible realms of plausible deniability. But that said, I suspect that based on who Mueller has been hiring, Trump's corrupt business dealings will soon dwarf the Russia issues. |
Anonymous
| If there's collusion ANYWHERE, it's with COMEY/LYNCH/HOLDER/OBAMA/CLINTON/JARRETT. |
Anonymous
|
Donald Trump doesn't even believe that Russia made attempts to influence our elections and insert themselves nefariously. He has said or intimated repeatedly that he is not convinced. How, on earth, can we move onto our future liabilities if he can't even admit that?
As to whether they actively colluded, it is still tough to tell. Everything about the campaign, the candidate, and the administration is such a raging cluster that it's hard to tell what is due to sheer incompetence and willful negligence, and what is due to malicious intent. As for his financial issues, those will end in multiple indictments but unless GOP wakes up and realizes these longstanding shady business dealings are a matter of national security with this man as president, it won't be enough to remove him. If that time DOES come, it will not matter if his base supports the idea or not. |
Anonymous
Anonymous
| ^^ was just going to post that. Ha! Maybe out brave FFUers can tend to putting down this story in lieu of arguing that Stephen Miller is DC's hottest bachelor... |
Anonymous
|
We have no idea what the Grand Jury is considering. Could it be an immunity plead for Awan on the Clinton Foundation that the FBI has been investigating since 2001 on the Pay for Play scheme?
As for undermining a democracy, can we revisit Obama sending US tax dollars to Israel to try to undermine Bibi's re-election in 2015? |
Anonymous
Denial is a river in Egypt. |
Anonymous
The Special Counsel needs a grand jury so he can issue subpoenas. Routine and expected. According to his lawyer, as far as he knows, President Trump is not a target of the investigation. There remains zero evidence of collusion. |
Anonymous
|
Anonymous
|
Here is how the Social Media platform impact our democracy.
https://twitter.com/conspirator0/status/900158823515770880 "No Collusion" |
Anonymous
What does it say? Not going to click on unknown links |
Anonymous
|
It's a twitter linked set of posts that outline how the Russian BOT system was established, how it was directed towards Brexit, the 2016 election, the 2017 French Election and is now focused on Merkel in Germany. The timing of the posts are from 8a to 8p Moscow time and the intensity of the posts correspond to each of the elections.
|
Anonymous
Seems like the Russians were up to no good. Do the posts show that Mr. Trump or his associates were colluding with the Russians to influence the 2016 election in America? That is what you asserted. It appears you are providing information to suggest that the Russians act on their own to meddle in elections and votes around the world. |