Trump donated his POTUS pay to DOI to fix military cemeteries

[Anonymous]

I can't take this thread seriously considering the millions of dollars it took to pay for security for Melania to not live in the White House for so many months and for the security detail so trump could hang out at mar a largo. Not to mention security for Jared and Ivanka. You rubes really are idiots if you aren't outraged about that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maybe he could also pay his fair share of taxes to help the veterans.

THIS Instead his "plan" would save his family 4 BILLION - which he needs far more than those silly veterans and their old cemeteries.

[Anonymous]

Trump threw you a crumb, Slobbering Fans, run and lick it up!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:bfd. The amount he will make from his conflicts of interests dwarfs his potus pay.

THIS

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I wish he would hire 110 more staffers who would vet his tweets before he sent them. That would definitely be $5m well spent.

You put social media crap over well kept military cemeteries? Not surprising at all.
Liberals, you are a peace of work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wish he would hire 110 more staffers who would vet his tweets before he sent them. That would definitely be $5m well spent.

You put social media crap over well kept military cemeteries? Not surprising at all.
Liberals, you are a peace of work.

Presumably you are not a liberal, from your post. Why do you find it so unfathomable that others who are not liberals also post on DCUM?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wish he would hire 110 more staffers who would vet his tweets before he sent them. That would definitely be $5m well spent.

You put social media crap over well kept military cemeteries? Not surprising at all.
Liberals, you are a peace of work.

It's a question of return on investment, really. One quarter of the president's annual salary to the Department of the Interior won't go very far to fix military cemeteries. But 110 staffers -- or however many it takes -- might do a lot to restore at least a veneer of presidential-ness to Trump's social media presence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wish he would hire 110 more staffers who would vet his tweets before he sent them. That would definitely be $5m well spent.

You put social media crap over well kept military cemeteries? Not surprising at all.
Liberals, you are a peace of work.

It's a question of return on investment, really. One quarter of the president's annual salary to the Department of the Interior won't go very far to fix military cemeteries. But 110 staffers -- or however many it takes -- might do a lot to restore at least a veneer of presidential-ness to Trump's social media presence.

^^^well, not restore, because it never existed in the first place. Establish.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wish he would hire 110 more staffers who would vet his tweets before he sent them. That would definitely be $5m well spent.

You put social media crap over well kept military cemeteries? Not surprising at all.
Liberals, you are a peace of work.

It's a question of return on investment, really. One quarter of the president's annual salary to the Department of the Interior won't go very far to fix military cemeteries. But 110 staffers -- or however many it takes -- might do a lot to restore at least a veneer of presidential-ness to Trump's social media presence.

His donation to DOI is ridiculous, considering he's cutting their budget by billions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wish he would hire 110 more staffers who would vet his tweets before he sent them. That would definitely be $5m well spent.

You put social media crap over well kept military cemeteries? Not surprising at all.
Liberals, you are a peace of work.

I don't believe Liberals are a "peace of work," otherwise we would have "whirled peas."

[Anonymous]

He's just paying it forward for the next round of casualties in his upcoming wars.

[Anonymous]

What makes you think he didn't pay his fair share of taxes? Maddow even proved he paid a much larger percentage (38%) than Sanders or MOST other Democrats in WASHINGTON. Our veterans Deserve the best kept cemeteries in the world...NOT JUST THE USA! ALSO don't forget PRESIDENT DONALD J TRUMP donated his first paycheck to the National Parks Service so you and others could enjoy well kept national parks. http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/04/03/donald-trump-donates-salary-national-park-service-first-quarter-2017 This is COMPLETELY CONTRARY TO THE OBUMMERS WHO WASTED 85 MILLION DOLLARS OF TAXPAYER MONEY ON PERSONAL VACATIONS IN ONLY 8 YEARS...WOW! http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/white-house/article123335079.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You sound like a silly servant. Why would we need 110 staffers to vet tweets, when one will do?

You sound like a moron who doesn't understand sarcasm and is too stupid to get a civil service job.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You sound like a silly servant. Why would we need 110 staffers to vet tweets, when one will do?

I'd rather he hire one person to vet his tweets than save $5m.

Most Americans feel the same.

I might as well wish for a unicorn, because Trump isn't going to stop his unpresidential tweeting.

Unclench your pearls and anal orifice

Howzabout you jerks stop trying to build an army of bureaucrats, committees, commissions and professional paper pushers in DC?

Those people do things. I heard that Rex Tillerson blew up at WH staff b/c he doesn't have enough people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I can't take this thread seriously considering the millions of dollars it took to pay for security for Melania to not live in the White House for so many months and for the security detail so trump could hang out at mar a largo. Not to mention security for Jared and Ivanka. You rubes really are idiots if you aren't outraged about that.

How well is your outrage managing to change the law that determines who should have security details?

For all the complaining people have done, I've seen no effort from people to make changes in this area. So hopefully you can tell me about how you're lobbying your legislators and getting other people to do the same...