Debate last night - change anything for anyone?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For me? Yes. It reaffirmed just how complicit the media is with the Democratic party.

It's a very dangerous thing for the media not to be a neutral party.

My vote will go with the Republicans because that can't stand.

The first step for you to heal is to shut off your main sources of "information." No Fox, no right wing radio, no clicking on that forward from your neighbor. You have to come back to Earth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The way Trump moved around the stage and stalked Clinton, I would have told him to back the flock up. That said, it affirmed my thought that Clinton is just more knowledgeable about policy.

And all of it has been bad.

Listening to Trump talk about his policies, they all sound bad too. The only thing going for HRC is that she can actually work with the other side. Trump can't work with anyone, not even his running mate or campaign staff. He's a one man-show, a know it all, "I don't have to read anything cause I'm smart", twittering fool.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The way Trump moved around the stage and stalked Clinton, I would have told him to back the flock up. That said, it affirmed my thought that Clinton is just more knowledgeable about policy.

And all of it has been bad.

The only thing I can make of Trump’s policy is he wants to lock us in, keep everybody else out, and take oil by force. Everything else is inarticulate and confusing except the p***y thing which he has his opinion firmly wrapped around (literally).

[Anonymous]

Someone pointed out trump actually had more time in the debate, but still managed to bitch about how unfair it was.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm curious to hear if last night's debate changed anything for anyone? Did it just confirm what you were already thinking, or was there anything said that made you think about making a change? Or helped if you were undecided?

After watching pre-debate coverage of Trump in hotel press room with women of Bill's past. I guess he flew them in. I decided that this debate is going to be an insult to my intellect, time and devoid of urgent issues that do matter. Hillary needs a solid credibible candidate to run against. A candidate that can go head to head with her in a debate on pertinent issues and a candidate who truly understand those issues other than grabbing rebuttal sound bites from Bernie during the primaries.

As a registered independent 40+ voter, debates between Trump and any other candidate is beneath my IQ level. Anyone who understands anything about a debate or former HS debate team member knows Trump is ill prepared and lacks full understanding. How much of a learning curve are his supporters willing to extend to him while running our country?

Voting early, nothing will change my vote between these two. Not a wiki leak or another leak of Trumps vulgarity to women. With these two candidates you know what you are getting. The question is which one are you willing to live with?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm curious to hear if last night's debate changed anything for anyone? Did it just confirm what you were already thinking, or was there anything said that made you think about making a change? Or helped if you were undecided?

After watching pre-debate coverage of Trump in hotel press room with women of Bill's past. I guess he flew them in. I decided that this debate is going to be an insult to my intellect, time and devoid of urgent issues that do matter. Hillary needs a solid credibible candidate to run against. A candidate that can go head to head with her in a debate on pertinent issues and a candidate who truly understand those issues other than grabbing rebuttal sound bites from Bernie during the primaries.

As a registered independent 40+ voter, debates between Trump and any other candidate is beneath my IQ level. Anyone who understands anything about a debate or former HS debate team member knows Trump is ill prepared and lacks full understanding. How much of a learning curve are his supporters willing to extend to him while running our country?

Voting early, nothing will change my vote between these two. Not a wiki leak or another leak of Trumps vulgarity to women. With these two candidates you know what you are getting. The question is which one are you willing to live with?

In the back of my mind I have always had the thought Trump is a plant, and was voted in as a "Republican" so that Hillary would not have any competition because she is so pathetic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not for me (I'm firmly in Hillary's camp, and I decided not to watch it), but my husband (who did watch it) switched from undecided/possible protest vote to Hillary. He said he felt disgusted while watching it how little time was spent on real substance of national importance because Trump kept bringing it down into the gutter (either through his statements during the debate, or because of the questions arising out of his past behavior), and how little he seemed to understand about the substantive issues. He said he kept wanting to hear more from Hillary, because she was the one who clearly understood them and had well-thought out positions. He also said he respected the fact that she didn't issue any death blows when he thought she could have, he felt like she was putting the dignity of our electoral process ahead of her desire to get the decisive win, and was probably looking ahead to how her conduct during the campaign would affect her ability to govern as president.

You are not honest. The media and Clinton campaign kept bringing this campaign to the gutter. That's her strategy. She can't defend her records or offer any new vision for the country. So she made a calculation to talk about Donald Trump's words.

Even Chris Matthews questioned the wisdom of media digging out a lock room tape from 11 years ago. That's gutter material that Clinton and her media buddies keep reaching to. I won't be surprised they will dig out important issues of Howard Stern show next.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm curious to hear if last night's debate changed anything for anyone? Did it just confirm what you were already thinking, or was there anything said that made you think about making a change? Or helped if you were undecided?

Before the debate, I thought Trump was done.

After the debate, I believe he still has a chance. Many of his points resonate strongly with independent folks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The way Trump moved around the stage and stalked Clinton, I would have told him to back the flock up. That said, it affirmed my thought that Clinton is just more knowledgeable about policy.

Did you watch the debate? I'm guessing you only looked at the pictures of it. Hillary was the one moving on stage... not in a bad way. She would just walk over to the audience. This made her position be in front of Trump. Trump just kind of stayed where he was when she did this. Of course, the photographs make it look different from what it was.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm curious to hear if last night's debate changed anything for anyone? Did it just confirm what you were already thinking, or was there anything said that made you think about making a change? Or helped if you were undecided?

Before the debate, I thought Trump was done.

After the debate, I believe he still has a chance. Many of his points resonate strongly with independent folks.

He is done.

[Anonymous]

No, he was moving around a lot. Pacing. It was off putting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The way Trump moved around the stage and stalked Clinton, I would have told him to back the flock up. That said, it affirmed my thought that Clinton is just more knowledgeable about policy.

Did you watch the debate? I'm guessing you only looked at the pictures of it. Hillary was the one moving on stage... not in a bad way. She would just walk over to the audience. This made her position be in front of Trump. Trump just kind of stayed where he was when she did this. Of course, the photographs make it look different from what it was.

+1. During the debate I was wondering, why is Clinton going to Trump's side all the time? If anything, she was the one stalking him.

[Anonymous]

anyone who is voting for Trump (like an earlier PP) because Pence is on the ticket has got to be a man who has no respect for women. All you have to do is read about his positions throughout his political career. He would take women's rights back to the dark ages.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The way Trump moved around the stage and stalked Clinton, I would have told him to back the flock up. That said, it affirmed my thought that Clinton is just more knowledgeable about policy.

Did you watch the debate? I'm guessing you only looked at the pictures of it. Hillary was the one moving on stage... not in a bad way. She would just walk over to the audience. This made her position be in front of Trump. Trump just kind of stayed where he was when she did this. Of course, the photographs make it look different from what it was.

+1. During the debate I was wondering, why is Clinton going to Trump's side all the time? If anything, she was the one stalking him.

You two are delusional. She moved to speak to the person asking the question. Trump paced the ENTIRE time. He didn't stop or sit down once. Nor did he ever speak to the actual audience.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm curious to hear if last night's debate changed anything for anyone? Did it just confirm what you were already thinking, or was there anything said that made you think about making a change? Or helped if you were undecided?

Before the debate, I thought Trump was done.

After the debate, I believe he still has a chance. Many of his points resonate strongly with independent folks.

30,000 emails deleted after a subpoena. Prosecutorial discretion. Trump apologized but Clinton did not for attacking women her husband abused emotionally and physically.
I wonder why Hilary Clinton didn't divorce Bill Clinton. Love? Greed? Ambition? EW.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/21/us/politics/90s-scandals-threaten-to-erode-hillary-clintons-strength-with-women.html?_r=0

"Over the years, the Clinton effort to cast doubt on the women included using words like “floozy,” “bimbo” and “stalker,” and raising questions about their motives. "
Bill Clinton was a charming powerful man. Anyone ever been victimized by such a person? The thing is he was an elected official. Trump was/is a loudmouth.

So if it was pedophilia would the person in a position of trust be more deplorable than the creep in a store?