Liberal Hypocrisy: DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz also has foreign accounts and swiss bank

jsteele
Site Admin Online
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:That's why she won't release her tax returns.


http://shark-tank.net/2012/07/10/harrington-calls-out-wasserman-schultz-to-release-her-tax-returns/


The candidate calling on Wasserman Schultz to release her tax returns hasn't released her own. What is she hiding? Typical Republican hypocrisy.


DC Urban Moms & Dads Administrator
http://twitter.com/jvsteele
https://mastodon.social/@jsteele
jsteele
Site Admin Online
Anonymous wrote:Do you have proof of that, Jeff?

To my knowledge, he has never released his long-form.... ok, this isn't going anywhere good.


Well, Ann Romney did say, "we better unzip him and let the real Mitt Romney out."

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/04/ann-romney-says-campaign-will-unzip-the-real-mitt/


DC Urban Moms & Dads Administrator
http://twitter.com/jvsteele
https://mastodon.social/@jsteele
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:HAHA, what a moron. How can she talk about Mitt romney's minor overseas funds in his blind trust that he doesn't manage when she has an even more direct investment in foreign accounts and swiss banks.

LOL

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/dem-chair-invested-swiss-banks-foreign-drug-companies-and-state-bank-india_648350.html




Op, what's in your 401K?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Romneys investments are the same type as Debbie blabber mouth Schultz 's.


How would you know? Romney claims he has no idea, so how can you?

Anyone who wants to know the real truth should look at 2009. That's his holdings before he started scrubbing them. Until he releases those, you can assume the worst.
Anonymous
Wasserman should not throw rocks in a glass house
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Wasserman should not throw rocks in a glass house


Wasserman does not have a foreign investment account. She has mutual funds.

Please, keep drilling on this, really. It only keeps Romney's finances in the news. The worst case scenario is that the public hates Wasserman and Romney. Only one of them is running for President.
Anonymous
Who cares .... We have all realiized Mitt is rich. He is rich bc he is a strong businessman who made money For himself snd his investors..investors (who invest their own cash) gamble on the fact that mitt and his team could turn around failing companies. He got rich along the way... It is standard protocal for the uber wealthy to have overseas investments...Diversify..so when the us stock market tanks you have monet elsewhere. Not illegal. But i guess wasserman shultz thinks he should be giving all of his cash to her to soend the way she sees fit
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Who cares .... We have all realiized Mitt is rich. He is rich bc he is a strong businessman who made money For himself snd his investors..investors (who invest their own cash) gamble on the fact that mitt and his team could turn around failing companies. He got rich along the way... It is standard protocal for the uber wealthy to have overseas investments...Diversify..so when the us stock market tanks you have monet elsewhere. Not illegal. But i guess wasserman shultz thinks he should be giving all of his cash to her to soend the way she sees fit


I have overseas investments. I don't have offshore accounts set up to avoid US taxes.

You seem to miss the obvious difference between owning shares in foreign corporations on one hand, and parking assets in a foreign bank in order to dodge taxes on the other. This is really basic stuff.
jsteele
Site Admin Online
Anonymous wrote:Who cares .... We have all realiized Mitt is rich. He is rich bc he is a strong businessman who made money For himself snd his investors..investors (who invest their own cash) gamble on the fact that mitt and his team could turn around failing companies. He got rich along the way... It is standard protocal for the uber wealthy to have overseas investments...Diversify..so when the us stock market tanks you have monet elsewhere. Not illegal. But i guess wasserman shultz thinks he should be giving all of his cash to her to soend the way she sees fit


Fair enough. Then there is no reason for Romney to dispute the charges. Correct?

DC Urban Moms & Dads Administrator
http://twitter.com/jvsteele
https://mastodon.social/@jsteele
Anonymous
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Who cares .... We have all realiized Mitt is rich. He is rich bc he is a strong businessman who made money For himself snd his investors..investors (who invest their own cash) gamble on the fact that mitt and his team could turn around failing companies. He got rich along the way... It is standard protocal for the uber wealthy to have overseas investments...Diversify..so when the us stock market tanks you have monet elsewhere. Not illegal. But i guess wasserman shultz thinks he should be giving all of his cash to her to soend the way she sees fit


Fair enough. Then there is no reason for Romney to dispute the charges. Correct?


So should every american who has 401k in foreign accounts be subject to the attacks of Wasserman?
jsteele
Site Admin Online
Anonymous wrote:
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Who cares .... We have all realiized Mitt is rich. He is rich bc he is a strong businessman who made money For himself snd his investors..investors (who invest their own cash) gamble on the fact that mitt and his team could turn around failing companies. He got rich along the way... It is standard protocal for the uber wealthy to have overseas investments...Diversify..so when the us stock market tanks you have monet elsewhere. Not illegal. But i guess wasserman shultz thinks he should be giving all of his cash to her to soend the way she sees fit


Fair enough. Then there is no reason for Romney to dispute the charges. Correct?


So should every american who has 401k in foreign accounts be subject to the attacks of Wasserman?


You are confused. Wasserman is being attacked by the OP of this thread for having 401K money in foreign investments. Of course, such attacks are not justified. Mitt is not being accused of having a 401K with foreign investments, but actually stashing money abroad. If, as the PP quoted above seems to believe, what Mitt did is no big deal, Mitt should just own up to it. Criticizing him for something he owns should not be considered a big deal.

DC Urban Moms & Dads Administrator
http://twitter.com/jvsteele
https://mastodon.social/@jsteele
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: