Maybe to spend time with his dad? More supervision during the day? Maybe to detour him from hanging out around the same old crowd while he's home on suspension? C'mon, PP, your post makes no sense. Also, have you ever been to Sanford, FL? It's not exactly a vacation hotspot. |
Since we don't know all the facts, it's of course possible it was in self-defense. I can't figure out why Zimmerman wasn't brought in for an official statement, at the very least?
Has anyone seen Trayvon's tweets? Nasty. |
Do you have a link to a recent picture of him? I haven't seen many. Many fake pics of other black teens but no recent ones of the actual Trayvon in question. Not sure how recent this one is? |
Am I missing a fact that shows a "clear intent" to apprehend? He clearly intended to follow, but I'm not sure that he originally intended to apprehend? And what makes you conclude that Z was "raging"? And what makes you conclude that the gunshot was retaliatory? Even if the facts are as you describe them, retaliation as a motive should not necessarily be inferred. I do NOT support Zimmerman and I believe he should be arrested and I believe that the SYG law is fundamentally flawed and that the police have committed a travesty. That being said, I do remember the Duke lacrosse situation and I do think it is important to jump to conclusions. Moreso, I think it is important not to cast anyone who acknowledges gaping holes in the known facts as some sort of racist supporter of a murderer. |
Doesn't matter if one man is taunting another. Assaulting someone = jail. Calling someone names = no jail. And the law in FL means that assaulting someone or even being threatening you are allowed to use deadly force. The attacker doesn't have to be armed to justify the shooting. |
if that is proven to be the case in a courtroom, i guess i would have no choice but to accept that outcome. i would still believe that there was a bit of profiling involved that lead to everything getting started but we would have to move on i guess. and dont think for a second that this means that racial profiling of black men is not a problem or doesnt exist if this happened by the way. thats not the way this works. |
if that is proven to be the case in a courtroom, i guess i would have no choice but to accept that outcome. i would still believe that there was a bit of profiling involved that lead to everything getting started but we would have to move on i guess. and dont think for a second that this means that racial profiling of black men is not a problem or doesnt exist if this happened by the way. thats not the way this works. |
But why would a teen who was talking to his girlfriend on the phone while carrying an iced tea and some candy home from the store and who was unarmed, turn and violently attack another man (who was armed and not a small man) for no reason. That scenario doesn't make any sense. If George was just so innocently keeping an eye on the teen or asked him what he was up to, unless Trayvon had a psychotic break or had some unknown explosive rage disorder he wouldn't turn and beat the man's head into a sidewalk. |
In your 20 years of courtroom experience, have you had a lot of success using "logic dictates" in place of - what's that word again - evidence? Also, you're just assuming Zimmerman "set upon TM" - which of course makes the entire fact pattern very easy. But that's the crux of the question, isn't it? Because if that didn't happen, self-defense is very much in play. As for "NO SET OF REASONABLE FACTS" - gimme a break. Z follows TM, yells at him to stop, TM stops, an argument ensues, Z says something to TM (likely an ugly racial epither, that we’ll never know, because Z will never admit to it), TM hits him and starts pummeling him to the ground, Z draws his weapon and shoots him. Isn’t that just as likely as the scenario you posited? At a minimum, it’s certainly a “set of reasonable facts.” Just because you don’t think that’s what happened, or don’t like the outcome it leads to, doesn’t make it “unreasonable.” Enough with the histrionics. |
It really doesn't matter what the public or media thinks of this, the point is that IT NEEDS TO GO TO TRIAL! |
do you want to listen to the music i listened to when i was 17-18? hell i still listen to it on my ipod and not out loud since i have kids. some of you are acting as if you grew up as priests and nuns. walk around a mall or walk a high school and stop acting like normal average teenagers walk around in button up shirts and khakis and listen to elevator music. |
No the minute thus guy with a gun posed a threat to Trayvon he had the right to defend himself. Who was chasing whom? And who had a gun? |
Perhaps you should look at the statute before you start proclaiming things that simply aren't true. |
I totally rocked out to elevator music at that age. |
Here are some: |