Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I professionally knew him. He is unintelligent, unprincipled. Only out for himself. And just an a!@. He only made Colonel because he decided to hitch a ride on the anti-trump train. He was passed over to lt col and only picked up at a special board. His bosses and peers did not like working with him and his paper accurately reflected that.
Hope he loses by a landslide!
Happy to do an ask me (almost) anything about him! Especially his dismissal of women, and the fact that the jag corps only asks people to work in the White House - usually the least best and the least brightest. He took the assignment my choice.
Tell us more about the dismissal of women. And also, did he ever have any political aspirations? Is his brother also inauthentic and insufferable?
Proceed with caution; you have no idea how reliable this anonymous source is.
OP here and I agree with taking sourceless posts with a grain of salt. But the man just oozes self-interest and superciliousness and, at least for me, I'd be more surprised if anyone actually likes him irl than the opposite. Contrast Vindman's behavior with Spanberger, the latter of whom has spent the last 6+ years criss-crossing the district and meeting with all rungs of people from all walks of life. Police officers, immigrants, small business owners, education leaders, health care workers, farmers, municipal governments. I adore Spanberger and plan on writing her name in this November.
How Vindman's brother and wife internet attacked Joshua Cole (D-65) last year was especially outrageous with Cole merely having asked the same question that many other democrats in our district were asking: "He lives here? Where's he been all year?" Vindman was, of course, nowhere to be found during all of the 2023 local house and senate races. I don't think this treatment of Joshua Cole is an anomaly: if Vindman can't use you to further his own interests, you are a roach to be stepped on.