OP here. high value treats is a great idea. My dog is very food-motivated. I already take treats with me, because we do small training exercises on our walks, but I need to get something higher value for this particular situation. Because in that moment with the neighbor dog, my dod did not GAF about anything, he was completely fixated on that other dog. Thanks for that suggestion. |
OP again, I think I was in a state of shock and a little traumatized (Im exaggerating) and am just now remembering more specifics. I remember in the midst of trying to get my dog in the house I looked over and the nieghbor had his dog in a sit. And they were both just looking. I remember thinking, fool keep walking, why did you stop!!!!
I'm laughing to myself about that this morning, because why?? ayyeye |
sometimes a dog owner will have a dog sit to keep it under control during a situation like what you are describing, when another dog is reacting so much. It does not strike me as that odd a thing |
Very true. The thing is, the neighbor's dog never barks or reacts to my dog at all. Ever. My dog is the only one losing his mind in this situation. |
If he has his balls than he is not neutered lol |
You have to pull it out before he loses his mind. Now you know about the dog so I would do my best to avoid. Perhaps you can text your neighbor to find out when they go out so you can not go out at the same time. |
. Yes, I know that’s how you tell. 🙄 |
I think you need to be careful with the timing of treats - you don't want to end up rewarding your dog for bad behaviors.
We had a large poodle who lost his shit all the time with certain dogs (loved others). If on a walk and uncertain of what he'd do, I'd distract him, keep him on the side of me furthest from the other dog, I'd also get him to sit and then praise him for being so good. All the while with my back to the other dog, blocking my dog's sight of it. This works well and is not traumatic. |
So it should be easy to know! |
You aren't rewarding bad behavior..you are changing how he feels about his trigger from negative to positive. Ooh I get really good treats when I see this dog! But he goes away the treats go away. Maybe he isn't so bad after all! It's called counter conditioning. Perhaps with a trainer ypu can work with your neighbor/dog so he can learn how to ignore! |
I think if that's what you're calling it, it needs to be done very carefully with a very good trainer, otherwise you are literally telling your dog "oh you're losing your shit, that's great, have a treat" |
Ok it is obvious you didn't understand what I wrote. Dogs who are reactive have very big emotions based on fear and anxiety. You want them to associate the trigger with something good happening. So at first every time you see the trigger you give the dog high value treats. Then the dog will start looking at you for the treat. When the dog is over threshold and is barking and lunging than it is too late. My dog would refuse treats when he was in that state. So there is no reward for 'losing your shit' as you so nicely put it. The goal is to have the dog not react and therefore you are paying them when they do not react. You then build in distance ( decrease the distance the dog can get to the trigger and duration how long they can be in the presence of the trigger) If in the end, the behavior you do not want stops what is wrong with rewarding them? |
No I totally understood. |
The dog can pick up on your anxiety/tension that you feel from history with this dog, which now will be increased since the incident. I'd practice snapping him out of his reactivity and bringing his focus back to you/calming down, whether indoors or outdoors. Sorry, OP. Sounds like you are doing well with having his place for him to go and he did obey. So you have a good foundation to build on. |
Ok we disagree them. Giving a reward for not reacting is giving them a reward for doing the right thing. But you think I give a reward when they bark and lunge ( which I do not) when my dog is barking and lunging he has zero interest in food. I have to catch him before. Still think I'm wrong? |