Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Agree. What is with "the woman needs to be believed" stuff? NO. The woman needs to be heard. That's all. If evidence supports her allegations, then she is to be believed. But to automatically pre-determine that the woman is telling the truth and the man is lying is just as bad as the reverse. |
|
People are coming back to their senses after an long attempt from the liberal media’s at brainwashing.
People see our economy is strong and Trump is effective in making agreements that benefit Americans. He is slowly unraveling the disaster that Obama created and people have their eyes open. |
+1 |
Where did I advocate automatic belief of every allegation without investigation? Where did I advocate punishment without due process? Nowhere. Why are you so incapable of understanding reality? Research indicates that the number of false rape allegations is very low. Tons of women being assaulted every year, most never come forward because they suspect, rightly, that they will not be believed or will just be ignored. This misguided focus on the low number of cases of false reports is part of the problem. Things like "Jackie" and the Duke case get huge press and headlines, while the day-in, day-out, ongoing mistreatment of women goes ignored. So disgusting how the focus is always on the MEN. "We must protect the men." No. We need to take these things seriously. We need to listen. |
I can't take anyone seriously who thinks the state of the economy is due to Trump and does not recognize how many factors, over many years, including those when Obama was in the White House, contribute to the current state of the economy. Sit down, loser. |
|
Phil Bredesen read the tea leaves and therefore came out saying he would have voted "yes" for Kavanaugh if he had been a sitting senator.
The problem is that he came out with this too late. What is more he was being disingenuous: he would not have voted for Kavanaugh any more so than Doug Jones in Alabama who talked a good game about being a moderate Democrat and then fell in line and voted against Kavanaugh. |
LOL. No good moderate on either side would vote Yes on Kavanaugh. He's not moderate AT ALL. |
You are agreeing with me that Bredesen would not have voted for Kavanaugh if he had been in the Senate. Hopefully, the voters of TN will see that he was just lying through his teeth. He should have had the b@lls to just come out and say that he could not have supported Kavanaugh's confirmation. |
You sit and prick your bubble and you'll see who's winning, and it ain't you. |
| It seems this thread has simply become another Kavanaugh thread. Please join the main thread. |