+1. No question. |
Look it up |
The other post was a statement of f fact. That’s the difference |
Amherst if you want a smaller college and Rice if you want a larger one. Simple |
You look it up. I know what it means. You said “sounds more like an opinion than conjecture.” A conjecture is an opinion, dolt. |
Which post in the thread above is a “statement of fact?” |
The one about the ivies with much better network and outcomes |
That was the point I was arguing in the first place so apparently you and I are on the same page and something got mixed up somewhere upthread. |
OR conclusion you idiot |
Very confusing since you don’t know who’s posting what and who’s responding to what |
? I think you’re confused. Maybe go to bed and see if you can figure it out tomorrow. |
Nope I’m good. Maybe it will help once you’re sober |
The fact that people like you won’t send their kids there is a positive for Rice. |
That last sentence is so laughable on a forum that’s based in DC. Also funny considering that “academic excellence” is the absolute lowest priority for any Ivy/SLAC these days. Unlike DC, where the DC police refused GW’s request to clear out the tent encampment on their campus, Texas is willing to do what’s necessary to make sure the students at their universities can continue to go to class and learn. In any case, who would want to go to college in a state with booming economy? Anyone who actually has any sense. Watch this animation and keep an eye on Texas and other southern states (and watch the Northeastern states drop). Texas and the South are the future. The Northeast schools had been living on prestige left over from past excellence, but are currently doing their level best to flush it all away. Add in a stagnant economy, and there’s no reason to go to school in the NE there unless your dream is to spend the rest of your life teaching ecofeminism for minimum wage. https://www.visualcapitalist.com/animation-the-20-largest-state-economies-by-gdp-in-the-last-50-years/ |
+1 !! |