BOE - who are people voting for?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voting conservative, the progressive camp are the reason for the failure.

What are the "conservative" candidates planning to conserve? If you're planning to make big changes, that's not conservative, it's radical.

You actually think conservative in the political realm means to conserve and keep things the way they are. You cannot be serious.

a return to the 3Rs!!!

Reading
Riting &
Rythmytic

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voting conservative, the progressive camp are the reason for the failure.

What are the "conservative" candidates planning to conserve? If you're planning to make big changes, that's not conservative, it's radical.

You actually think conservative in the political realm means to conserve and keep things the way they are. You cannot be serious.

If so-called conservatives actually aren't conserving anything, maybe they should change their name? Or, more realistically, maybe people who aren't so-called conservatives should start using names for so-called conservatives that are more accurate, like "Republican" or "MAGA" or "reactionary".

You are dumber than a box of rocks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voting conservative, the progressive camp are the reason for the failure.

What are the "conservative" candidates planning to conserve? If you're planning to make big changes, that's not conservative, it's radical.

You actually think conservative in the political realm means to conserve and keep things the way they are. You cannot be serious.

If so-called conservatives actually aren't conserving anything, maybe they should change their name? Or, more realistically, maybe people who aren't so-called conservatives should start using names for so-called conservatives that are more accurate, like "Republican" or "MAGA" or "reactionary".

You think conservative only means conserving? Do you need help using your device to look up words in a dictionary?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voting conservative, the progressive camp are the reason for the failure.

What are the "conservative" candidates planning to conserve? If you're planning to make big changes, that's not conservative, it's radical.

You actually think conservative in the political realm means to conserve and keep things the way they are. You cannot be serious.

If so-called conservatives actually aren't conserving anything, maybe they should change their name? Or, more realistically, maybe people who aren't so-called conservatives should start using names for so-called conservatives that are more accurate, like "Republican" or "MAGA" or "reactionary".

Or more realistically, maybe you could educate yourself to the fact that many words have numerous definitions and meanings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voting conservative, the progressive camp are the reason for the failure.

What are the "conservative" candidates planning to conserve? If you're planning to make big changes, that's not conservative, it's radical.

You actually think conservative in the political realm means to conserve and keep things the way they are. You cannot be serious.

If so-called conservatives actually aren't conserving anything, maybe they should change their name? Or, more realistically, maybe people who aren't so-called conservatives should start using names for so-called conservatives that are more accurate, like "Republican" or "MAGA" or "reactionary".

You think conservative only means conserving? Do you need help using your device to look up words in a dictionary?

It's right there in the word. Conservative. So yes, I do think that people who call themselves conservatives should actually support conserving things, not overthrowing things. What's the appropriate word for people who want to overthrow things? Overthrowers? Insurrectionists?

[Anonymous]

How has it been at the early voting centers? Were there lots of BOE advocates out trying to sway voters last minute?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voting conservative, the progressive camp are the reason for the failure.

What are the "conservative" candidates planning to conserve? If you're planning to make big changes, that's not conservative, it's radical.

You actually think conservative in the political realm means to conserve and keep things the way they are. You cannot be serious.

If so-called conservatives actually aren't conserving anything, maybe they should change their name? Or, more realistically, maybe people who aren't so-called conservatives should start using names for so-called conservatives that are more accurate, like "Republican" or "MAGA" or "reactionary".

You think conservative only means conserving? Do you need help using your device to look up words in a dictionary?

It's right there in the word. Conservative. So yes, I do think that people who call themselves conservatives should actually support conserving things, not overthrowing things. What's the appropriate word for people who want to overthrow things? Overthrowers? Insurrectionists?

Ah, you do need help locating a dictionary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voting conservative, the progressive camp are the reason for the failure.

What are the "conservative" candidates planning to conserve? If you're planning to make big changes, that's not conservative, it's radical.

You actually think conservative in the political realm means to conserve and keep things the way they are. You cannot be serious.

If so-called conservatives actually aren't conserving anything, maybe they should change their name? Or, more realistically, maybe people who aren't so-called conservatives should start using names for so-called conservatives that are more accurate, like "Republican" or "MAGA" or "reactionary".

You think conservative only means conserving? Do you need help using your device to look up words in a dictionary?

It's right there in the word. Conservative. So yes, I do think that people who call themselves conservatives should actually support conserving things, not overthrowing things. What's the appropriate word for people who want to overthrow things? Overthrowers? Insurrectionists?

You contradict yourself because you say conservative has to mean conserving (which is not the only meaning, but you don’t seem to get that) yet, say that conservatives overthrow. That would be the opposite of conserving, so you prove your own obtuse point as wrong.

[Anonymous]

Not the pot smoking advocate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How has it been at the early voting centers? Were there lots of BOE advocates out trying to sway voters last minute?

The only one I've seen who is really getting out there ifs Mofor:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voting conservative, the progressive camp are the reason for the failure.

What are the "conservative" candidates planning to conserve? If you're planning to make big changes, that's not conservative, it's radical.

You actually think conservative in the political realm means to conserve and keep things the way they are. You cannot be serious.

If so-called conservatives actually aren't conserving anything, maybe they should change their name? Or, more realistically, maybe people who aren't so-called conservatives should start using names for so-called conservatives that are more accurate, like "Republican" or "MAGA" or "reactionary".

You think conservative only means conserving? Do you need help using your device to look up words in a dictionary?

It's right there in the word. Conservative. So yes, I do think that people who call themselves conservatives should actually support conserving things, not overthrowing things. What's the appropriate word for people who want to overthrow things? Overthrowers? Insurrectionists?

You contradict yourself because you say conservative has to mean conserving (which is not the only meaning, but you don’t seem to get that) yet, say that conservatives overthrow. That would be the opposite of conserving, so you prove your own obtuse point as wrong.

Dude. It's the so-called conservatives who are contradicting themselves. Yes, overthrowing is the opposite of conserving. That's the whole point. Or, if you think the so-called "conservative" candidates in the BoE race are actually proposing to conserve things, maybe you can explain what things they're proposing to conserve?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voting conservative, the progressive camp are the reason for the failure.

What are the "conservative" candidates planning to conserve? If you're planning to make big changes, that's not conservative, it's radical.

You actually think conservative in the political realm means to conserve and keep things the way they are. You cannot be serious.

If so-called conservatives actually aren't conserving anything, maybe they should change their name? Or, more realistically, maybe people who aren't so-called conservatives should start using names for so-called conservatives that are more accurate, like "Republican" or "MAGA" or "reactionary".

You think conservative only means conserving? Do you need help using your device to look up words in a dictionary?

It's right there in the word. Conservative. So yes, I do think that people who call themselves conservatives should actually support conserving things, not overthrowing things. What's the appropriate word for people who want to overthrow things? Overthrowers? Insurrectionists?

You contradict yourself because you say conservative has to mean conserving (which is not the only meaning, but you don’t seem to get that) yet, say that conservatives overthrow. That would be the opposite of conserving, so you prove your own obtuse point as wrong.

Dude. It's the so-called conservatives who are contradicting themselves. Yes, overthrowing is the opposite of conserving. That's the whole point. Or, if you think the so-called "conservative" candidates in the BoE race are actually proposing to conserve things, maybe you can explain what things they're proposing to conserve?

What are you blathering on about? And you just admitted that you contradicted yourself which is what the pp said. You said conservative means conserving. No one else did. You’re the one who said the BoE will conserve under conservatives. Why are you asking others what they will conserve? That was your take.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voting conservative, the progressive camp are the reason for the failure.

What are the "conservative" candidates planning to conserve? If you're planning to make big changes, that's not conservative, it's radical.

You actually think conservative in the political realm means to conserve and keep things the way they are. You cannot be serious.

If so-called conservatives actually aren't conserving anything, maybe they should change their name? Or, more realistically, maybe people who aren't so-called conservatives should start using names for so-called conservatives that are more accurate, like "Republican" or "MAGA" or "reactionary".

You think conservative only means conserving? Do you need help using your device to look up words in a dictionary?

It's right there in the word. Conservative. So yes, I do think that people who call themselves conservatives should actually support conserving things, not overthrowing things. What's the appropriate word for people who want to overthrow things? Overthrowers? Insurrectionists?

You contradict yourself because you say conservative has to mean conserving (which is not the only meaning, but you don’t seem to get that) yet, say that conservatives overthrow. That would be the opposite of conserving, so you prove your own obtuse point as wrong.

Dude. It's the so-called conservatives who are contradicting themselves. Yes, overthrowing is the opposite of conserving. That's the whole point. Or, if you think the so-called "conservative" candidates in the BoE race are actually proposing to conserve things, maybe you can explain what things they're proposing to conserve?

Yet again, get a dictionary. You have a device; a dictionary is available on it. Bro.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voting conservative, the progressive camp are the reason for the failure.

What are the "conservative" candidates planning to conserve? If you're planning to make big changes, that's not conservative, it's radical.

You actually think conservative in the political realm means to conserve and keep things the way they are. You cannot be serious.

If so-called conservatives actually aren't conserving anything, maybe they should change their name? Or, more realistically, maybe people who aren't so-called conservatives should start using names for so-called conservatives that are more accurate, like "Republican" or "MAGA" or "reactionary".

You think conservative only means conserving? Do you need help using your device to look up words in a dictionary?

It's right there in the word. Conservative. So yes, I do think that people who call themselves conservatives should actually support conserving things, not overthrowing things. What's the appropriate word for people who want to overthrow things? Overthrowers? Insurrectionists?

You contradict yourself because you say conservative has to mean conserving (which is not the only meaning, but you don’t seem to get that) yet, say that conservatives overthrow. That would be the opposite of conserving, so you prove your own obtuse point as wrong.

Dude. It's the so-called conservatives who are contradicting themselves. Yes, overthrowing is the opposite of conserving. That's the whole point. Or, if you think the so-called "conservative" candidates in the BoE race are actually proposing to conserve things, maybe you can explain what things they're proposing to conserve?

What are you blathering on about? And you just admitted that you contradicted yourself which is what the pp said. You said conservative means conserving. No one else did. You’re the one who said the BoE will conserve under conservatives. Why are you asking others what they will conserve? That was your take.

Why do people who are not interested in conserving - who are, in fact, OPPOSED to conserving - call themselves "conservatives"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voting conservative, the progressive camp are the reason for the failure.

What are the "conservative" candidates planning to conserve? If you're planning to make big changes, that's not conservative, it's radical.

You actually think conservative in the political realm means to conserve and keep things the way they are. You cannot be serious.

If so-called conservatives actually aren't conserving anything, maybe they should change their name? Or, more realistically, maybe people who aren't so-called conservatives should start using names for so-called conservatives that are more accurate, like "Republican" or "MAGA" or "reactionary".

You think conservative only means conserving? Do you need help using your device to look up words in a dictionary?

It's right there in the word. Conservative. So yes, I do think that people who call themselves conservatives should actually support conserving things, not overthrowing things. What's the appropriate word for people who want to overthrow things? Overthrowers? Insurrectionists?

You contradict yourself because you say conservative has to mean conserving (which is not the only meaning, but you don’t seem to get that) yet, say that conservatives overthrow. That would be the opposite of conserving, so you prove your own obtuse point as wrong.

Dude. It's the so-called conservatives who are contradicting themselves. Yes, overthrowing is the opposite of conserving. That's the whole point. Or, if you think the so-called "conservative" candidates in the BoE race are actually proposing to conserve things, maybe you can explain what things they're proposing to conserve?

You are not helping. Would you just shut up?