Does Twitter death spiral mean the end of San Francisco?
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
| Twitter was the vanguard of companies coming to downtown San Fran but with WFH and Twitter and homeless. |
Anonymous
| No |
Anonymous
| If the 1906 earthquake couldn't kill SF then Twitter definitely won't. |
Anonymous
| No. |
Anonymous
| No, what a dumb question |
Anonymous
| My, what an inane post. |
Anonymous
| All of Twitter was WFH - none of them were in office. Its their new small towns that should worry. |
Anonymous
| This would not be something I would have considered at all. Definitely not. |
Anonymous
| That's a tad hyperbolic. |
Anonymous
| Wtf are you talking about OP. Twitter wasn't the vanguard of tech in SF |
Anonymous
It was the company that drove the tax deal to spur tech companies to locate in runs down parts of the city. It transformed the region and other companies followed https://www.businessinsider.com/its-official-twitter-is-staying-in-san-francisco-2011-4?amp PS: Vanguard definition: a group of people leading the way in new developments or ideas. |
Anonymous
| I love it when people in tech think that they are the only people in SF. Of course Twitter imploding isn't the end of SF. |